Difference between revisions of "Resource:D028a0a6-712d-4189-8add-932e3af6edd1"

From The Embassy of Good Science
(Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Cases |Title=A Letter of Resignation |Is About=A case study appearing in a blog site that posts on sexual misconduct in higher education. Sexual dema...")
 
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|Resource Type=Cases
 
|Resource Type=Cases
 
|Title=A Letter of Resignation
 
|Title=A Letter of Resignation
|Is About=A case study appearing in a blog site that posts on sexual misconduct in higher education. Sexual demands, bullying, coercion, harassment and a long list of similar behaviours are less frequently reported as misconduct in research ethics; but do these behaviours comply with the ECCRI's<ref>ECCRI: [https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/other/hi/h2020-ethics_code-of-conduct_en.pdf The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity]</ref> <ref>ECCRI: [https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/other/hi/h2020-ethics_code-of-conduct_en.pdf The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity]</ref>principle of respect for colleagues? or, with the good research practices of safeguards and collaborative working?
+
|Is About=A case study appearing in a blog site that posts on sexual misconduct in higher education. Sexual demands, bullying, coercion, harassment and a long list of similar behaviours are less frequently reported as misconduct in research ethics; but do these behaviours comply with the ECCRI<ref>ECCRI: [https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/other/hi/h2020-ethics_code-of-conduct_en.pdf The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity]https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/docs/2021-2027/horizon/guidance/european-code-of-conduct-for-research-integrity_horizon_en.pdf<br /></ref>'s principle of respect for colleagues? or, with the good research practices of safeguards and collaborative working?
 +
<references />
 
|Important Because=This case is one of several examples - presented in this blog site - on how sexual misconduct can violate the ECCRI's principles and good practices in work spaces of academia.
 
|Important Because=This case is one of several examples - presented in this blog site - on how sexual misconduct can violate the ECCRI's principles and good practices in work spaces of academia.
 
|Important For=Academic staff; Women in academia
 
|Important For=Academic staff; Women in academia

Latest revision as of 11:51, 28 June 2021

Cases

A Letter of Resignation

What is this about?

A case study appearing in a blog site that posts on sexual misconduct in higher education. Sexual demands, bullying, coercion, harassment and a long list of similar behaviours are less frequently reported as misconduct in research ethics; but do these behaviours comply with the ECCRI[1]'s principle of respect for colleagues? or, with the good research practices of safeguards and collaborative working?

Why is this important?

This case is one of several examples - presented in this blog site - on how sexual misconduct can violate the ECCRI's principles and good practices in work spaces of academia.

For whom is this important?

Other information

Virtues & Values
Good Practices & Misconduct
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6