Goal (Instruction Goal)
From The Embassy of Good Science
(MWBot) |
(MWBot) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | <!--------------------------------- | + | <!--------------------------------- MANAGED PROPERTY ----------------------------------><!-- |
<!-- DESCRIPTION --><div class="description-box">{{int:EGS Has Goal Desc}}</div><!-- /DESCRIPTION --> | <!-- DESCRIPTION --><div class="description-box">{{int:EGS Has Goal Desc}}</div><!-- /DESCRIPTION --> | ||
Latest revision as of 16:09, 28 November 2023
0
Members of The Embassy of Good Science have developed a set of six user-friendly, accessible methods for analysing research ethics and research integrity cases.
These methods have been identified, adapted and presented so that they can be appropriated by all users, without prior philosophical knowledge, in local contexts. +
02 - The Seven Steps Method: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity +
Members of The Embassy of Good Science have developed a set of six user-friendly, accessible methods for analysing research ethics and research integrity cases.
These methods have been identified, adapted and presented so that they can be appropriated by all users, without prior philosophical knowledge, in local contexts. +
03 - Four Quadrant Approach: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity +
Members of The Embassy of Good Science have developed a set of six user-friendly, accessible methods for analysing research ethics and research integrity cases.
These methods have been identified, adapted and presented so that they can be appropriated by all users, without prior philosophical knowledge, in local contexts. +
04 - Moral Case Deliberation: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity +
Members of The Embassy of Good Science have developed a set of six user-friendly, accessible methods for analysing research ethics and research integrity cases.
These methods have been identified, adapted and presented so that they can be appropriated by all users, without prior philosophical knowledge, in local contexts. +
Members of The Embassy of Good Science have developed a set of six user-friendly, accessible methods for analysing research ethics and research integrity cases.
These methods have been identified, adapted and presented so that they can be appropriated by all users, without prior philosophical knowledge, in local contexts. +
Members of The Embassy of Good Science have developed a set of six user-friendly, accessible methods for analysing research ethics and research integrity cases.
These methods have been identified, adapted and presented so that they can be appropriated by all users, without prior philosophical knowledge, in local contexts. +
A
Bu bölümde bulunan talimatlar, katılımcılara (yüz yüze) grup oturumları arasında yapılması gereken çalışmaları nasıl organize edecekleri hususunda bilgi vermektedir. +
Bu modülde, araştırma doğruluğuyla ilgili genel ilkelere giriş yapılmakta, Araştırmalarda Dürüstlük Konusunda Avrupa Davranış Kodu (ECoC)’nun çizdiği kılavuz niteliğindeki çerçeve açıklanmakta ve sizden ECoC’u kendi karşılaştığınız durumlara uyarlamanız istenmektedir. +
C
After completing this module learners will be able to: a) Understand the concept of conflict of interest and how to deal with it, and b) Recognise and disclose financial and non-financial conflicts of interest in the context of citizen science. +
D
This exercise helps participants to identify the features of, and differences between, debate and dialogue. Participants become aware of the strengths of dialogue as a tool for reflection processes. +
Diese Übung hilft den Teilnehmenden, die Merkmale und Unterschiede zwischen einer Debatte und einem Dialog zu erkennen. Sie lernen, dass der Dialog ein wertvolles Werkzeug für Reflexionsprozesse ist. +
Bu bölümde bulunan talimatlar, katılımcılara VIRT2UE eğitiminin ikinci (yüz yüze) grup oturumu için nasıl hazırlanacakları ve bu oturumda neler yapacakları hususunda bilgi vermektedir. +
''Kann man zu ehrlich sein?'' Diese Übung hilft den Teilnehmenden, moralische Sensibilität in Bezug auf jene Werte und Tugenden zu entwickeln, die grundlegend im Zusammenhang mit Research Integrity stehen. Die Übung fördert insbesondere die Reflexion über die moralische Ambiguität, die bestimmten Werten und Tugenden innewohnt. +
Diese Übung fördert die Reflexion über das Konzept des Guten und dessen Anwendung im wissenschaftlichen Kontext +
The “Diner Pensant – Tasteful conversations to empower good practices in science” is a workshop method to promote a ''food for thought'' critical reflection about good and bad scientific practices, in a relaxing, interactive, and enjoyable atmosphere. +
Bu bölümde bulunan talimatlar, sizi VIRT2UE araştırma doğruluğu karma öğrenme programının ilk (yüz yüze) grup oturumlarına hazırlamaktadır. +
E
Bu modülde, erdem etiği konusuna giriş yapılmakta ve erdem etiğinin araştırma doğruluğuyla olan ilişkisi üzerinde durulmaktadır. Eğitimi alan kişilerden, yeni edindikleri bilgilerle ilgili olarak kendilerini değerlendirmeleri, öğrenilen kavramları interaktif alıştırmalarda kullanmaları ya da daha önceki deneyimlerine dayanarak bu kavramların kendi günlük araştırma pratikleriyle olan ilişkisi üzerine fikir yürütmeleri ve yorumlamalarda bulunmaları istenmektedir. +
Bu alıştırma, erdemlerin eylem normları ile ilişkilendirilerek gerçek yaşamda karşılaşılan ikilemlerde uygulanması için farklı yöntemlerin geliştirilmesine ve gerçek bir RI ikileminin diyalog yoluyla farklı perspektiflerden yorumlanmasına yardımcı olmaktadır. +
Via this module learners gain an understanding of the principles and values of open science, including its ethical foundations and societal benefits. +
In the below videos, you can watch annotated webinars from the PREPARED project meetings in Bonn and in Paris. +
