Difference between revisions of "Instruction:17705907-d9b2-4f33-bc4f-088d84b4d971"

From The Embassy of Good Science
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Instruction
 
{{Instruction
 
|Title=Preparatory Viewing: Introduction to Concepts & Themes
 
|Title=Preparatory Viewing: Introduction to Concepts & Themes
 +
|Has Related Initiative=Initiative:8eed30fd-c2ed-44d1-9752-753092bd350e
 
|Instruction Goal=The VIRT2UE project has developed videos introducing the concept of Research Integrity. These are available on [https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_tr-rcbm3VwuL4jcpUZkDA The Embassy youtube channel.]
 
|Instruction Goal=The VIRT2UE project has developed videos introducing the concept of Research Integrity. These are available on [https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_tr-rcbm3VwuL4jcpUZkDA The Embassy youtube channel.]
 
|Has Duration=0.5
 
|Has Duration=0.5
Line 10: Line 11:
 
{{Instruction Step Trainee
 
{{Instruction Step Trainee
 
|Instruction Step Title=Moral Disengagement in Research
 
|Instruction Step Title=Moral Disengagement in Research
|Instruction Step Text=How researchers’ moral judgments can be affected by individual and contextual factors, explained by the VIRT2UE project for The Embassy of Good Science. <br />
+
|Instruction Step Text=This video explores how researchers’ moral judgments can be affected by individual and contextual factors, explained by the VIRT2UE project for The Embassy of Good Science. <br />
 
[[File: MoralDisagreements.png|link=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bIGuvc8Qbmw&list=PLabbUwyulArzx9SIqxfDXbtTELS8uWdFD&index=2]]
 
[[File: MoralDisagreements.png|link=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bIGuvc8Qbmw&list=PLabbUwyulArzx9SIqxfDXbtTELS8uWdFD&index=2]]
  
  
An exploration of how moral disengagement may occur among researchers due to maladaptive strategies to address conflicting imperatives in science and how virtuous ethics is important and may be seen as a means to counterbalance the process of moral disengagement. In the video, the risk of moral disengagement is explored, as well as the importance of virtues in research and systems fostering research integrity.
+
An exploration of how moral disengagement may occur among researchers due to maladaptive strategies to address conflicting imperatives in science. A virtue ethics approach might prevent the process of moral disengagement. In the video, the risk of moral disengagement is explored, as well as the importance of virtues in research and systems fostering research integrity.
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{Instruction Step Trainee
 
{{Instruction Step Trainee
 
|Instruction Step Title=Ethical Decision Making in Research
 
|Instruction Step Title=Ethical Decision Making in Research
|Instruction Step Text=Ethical and unethical behaviors explained, in the context of research.  
+
|Instruction Step Text=In this video, ethical and unethical research behaviors are explained.  
 
[[File:  Ethical decision making4.png|link=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HRBJxLo6k5s&list=PLabbUwyulArzx9SIqxfDXbtTELS8uWdFD&index=3]]
 
[[File:  Ethical decision making4.png|link=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HRBJxLo6k5s&list=PLabbUwyulArzx9SIqxfDXbtTELS8uWdFD&index=3]]
  
  
  
A translation of three common frameworks for ethical analysis (deontology, consequentialism, virtue ethics) into the context of research. It is argued that for research integrity, these frameworks may be regarded complementary, since science may be seen as a communal practice that strives towards a common good (utilitarianism), which can only be done in compliance with certain principles, rules, and codes inherent in the scientific endeavor (deontology). Virtue ethics may foster the best side of deontology and consequentialism, as a virtuous person is both informed by rules or beneficial consequences and knows how to apply rules and how to appreciate consequences by having insight into concrete situations.
+
The video translates three common frameworks for ethical analysis (deontology, consequentialism, virtue ethics) into the context of research. These frameworks are described as complementary, since science may be seen as a communal practice that strives towards a common good (utilitarianism), which can only be done in compliance with certain principles, rules, and codes inherent in the scientific endeavor (deontology). Virtue ethics may foster the best side of deontology and consequentialism, as a virtuous person is both informed by rules or beneficial consequences and knows how to apply rules and how to appreciate consequences by having insight into concrete situations.
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{Instruction Step Trainee
 
{{Instruction Step Trainee

Latest revision as of 15:33, 16 April 2024

Preparatory Viewing: Introduction to Concepts & Themes

Instructions for:TraineeTrainer
Related Initiative
Goal
The VIRT2UE project has developed videos introducing the concept of Research Integrity. These are available on The Embassy youtube channel.
Duration (hours)
0.5
For whom is this important?
Part of
Icon-virt2ue 2.svg
VIRT2UE
1
Moral Disengagement in Research

This video explores how researchers’ moral judgments can be affected by individual and contextual factors, explained by the VIRT2UE project for The Embassy of Good Science.

MoralDisagreements.png


An exploration of how moral disengagement may occur among researchers due to maladaptive strategies to address conflicting imperatives in science. A virtue ethics approach might prevent the process of moral disengagement. In the video, the risk of moral disengagement is explored, as well as the importance of virtues in research and systems fostering research integrity.

2
Ethical Decision Making in Research

In this video, ethical and unethical research behaviors are explained.

Ethical decision making4.png


The video translates three common frameworks for ethical analysis (deontology, consequentialism, virtue ethics) into the context of research. These frameworks are described as complementary, since science may be seen as a communal practice that strives towards a common good (utilitarianism), which can only be done in compliance with certain principles, rules, and codes inherent in the scientific endeavor (deontology). Virtue ethics may foster the best side of deontology and consequentialism, as a virtuous person is both informed by rules or beneficial consequences and knows how to apply rules and how to appreciate consequences by having insight into concrete situations.

3
Research Integrity Networks

During the 2019 World Conference on Research Integrity in Hong Kong, we asked experts on the importance and usefulness of Research Integrity networks. Research Integrity Networks3.png

4
What is Research Integrity?

During the 2019 World Conference on Research Integrity in Hong Kong, we asked experts to explain the concept of Research Integrity.
What is research integrity3.png

5
Research Integrity Education: What do experts say?

During the 2019 World Conference on Research Integrity in Hong Kong, we asked experts on their opinions and views on Research Integrity education.
Research Integrity Education3.png

Steps

Other information

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6