Module
From The Embassy of Good Science
- Choose a category:
- Guide (7)
- Initiative (29)
- Instruction (71)
- Interactive Content (5)
- Report (16)
- Resource (1078)
- Theme (188)
BackIndividual exercises
Practice oriented step-by-step instructions that will help you as a research integrity and ethics trainer and trainee.
Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.
For whom is this important?
Participants
Related Initiative
Method
70 Instructions ordered by recently added
Instruction
Members of The Embassy of Good Science have developed a set of six user-friendly, accessible methods for analysing research ethics and research integrity cases.
These methods have been identified, adapted and presented so that they can be appropriated by all users, without prior philosophical knowledge, in local contexts.
Instruction
Members of The Embassy of Good Science have developed a set of six user-friendly, accessible methods for analysing research ethics and research integrity cases.
These methods have been identified, adapted and presented so that they can be appropriated by all users, without prior philosophical knowledge, in local contexts.
Instruction
Members of The Embassy of Good Science have developed a set of six user-friendly, accessible methods for analysing research ethics and research integrity cases.
These methods have been identified, adapted and presented so that they can be appropriated by all users, without prior philosophical knowledge, in local contexts.
Instruction
04 - Moral Case Deliberation: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity
Members of The Embassy of Good Science have developed a set of six user-friendly, accessible methods for analysing research ethics and research integrity cases.
These methods have been identified, adapted and presented so that they can be appropriated by all users, without prior philosophical knowledge, in local contexts.
Instruction
Members of The Embassy of Good Science have developed a set of six user-friendly, accessible methods for analysing research ethics and research integrity cases.
These methods have been identified, adapted and presented so that they can be appropriated by all users, without prior philosophical knowledge, in local contexts.
Instruction
Members of The Embassy of Good Science have developed a set of six user-friendly, accessible methods for analysing research ethics and research integrity cases.
These methods have been identified, adapted and presented so that they can be appropriated by all users, without prior philosophical knowledge, in local contexts.
Instruction
Bu bölümde bulunan talimatlar, katılımcılara (yüz yüze) grup oturumları arasında yapılması gereken çalışmaları nasıl organize edecekleri hususunda bilgi vermektedir.
Instruction
Bu modülde, araştırma doğruluğuyla ilgili genel ilkelere giriş yapılmakta, Araştırmalarda Dürüstlük Konusunda Avrupa Davranış Kodu (ECoC)’nun çizdiği kılavuz niteliğindeki çerçeve açıklanmakta ve sizden ECoC’u kendi karşılaştığınız durumlara uyarlamanız istenmektedir.
Instruction
After completing this module learners will be able to: a) Understand the concept of conflict of interest and how to deal with it, and b) Recognise and disclose financial and non-financial conflicts of interest in the context of citizen science.
Instruction
This exercise helps participants to identify the features of, and differences between, debate and dialogue. Participants become aware of the strengths of dialogue as a tool for reflection processes.
Instruction
Diese Übung hilft den Teilnehmenden, die Merkmale und Unterschiede zwischen einer Debatte und einem Dialog zu erkennen. Sie lernen, dass der Dialog ein wertvolles Werkzeug für Reflexionsprozesse ist.
Instruction
Bu bölümde bulunan talimatlar, katılımcılara VIRT2UE eğitiminin ikinci (yüz yüze) grup oturumu için nasıl hazırlanacakları ve bu oturumda neler yapacakları hususunda bilgi vermektedir.
Instruction
Kann man zu ehrlich sein? Diese Übung hilft den Teilnehmenden, moralische Sensibilität in Bezug auf jene Werte und Tugenden zu entwickeln, die grundlegend im Zusammenhang mit Research Integrity stehen. Die Übung fördert insbesondere die Reflexion über die moralische Ambiguität, die bestimmten Werten und Tugenden innewohnt.
Instruction
Diese Übung fördert die Reflexion über das Konzept des Guten und dessen Anwendung im wissenschaftlichen Kontext
Instruction
The “Diner Pensant – Tasteful conversations to empower good practices in science” is a workshop method to promote a food for thought critical reflection about good and bad scientific practices, in a relaxing, interactive, and enjoyable atmosphere.
Instruction
Bu bölümde bulunan talimatlar, sizi VIRT2UE araştırma doğruluğu karma öğrenme programının ilk (yüz yüze) grup oturumlarına hazırlamaktadır.
Instruction
Bu modülde, erdem etiği konusuna giriş yapılmakta ve erdem etiğinin araştırma doğruluğuyla olan ilişkisi üzerinde durulmaktadır. Eğitimi alan kişilerden, yeni edindikleri bilgilerle ilgili olarak kendilerini değerlendirmeleri, öğrenilen kavramları interaktif alıştırmalarda kullanmaları ya da daha önceki deneyimlerine dayanarak bu kavramların kendi günlük araştırma pratikleriyle olan ilişkisi üzerine fikir yürütmeleri ve yorumlamalarda bulunmaları istenmektedir.
Instruction
Bu alıştırma, erdemlerin eylem normları ile ilişkilendirilerek gerçek yaşamda karşılaşılan ikilemlerde uygulanması için farklı yöntemlerin geliştirilmesine ve gerçek bir RI ikileminin diyalog yoluyla farklı perspektiflerden yorumlanmasına yardımcı olmaktadır.
Instruction
Via this module learners gain an understanding of the principles and values of open science, including its ethical foundations and societal benefits.
Instruction
In the below videos, you can watch annotated webinars from the PREPARED project meetings in Bonn and in Paris.
Instruction
Burada bulunan talimatlar size bir VIRT2UE eğitimini organize ederken takip etmeniz gereken adımlara ilişkin genel bir çerçeve sunmaktadır.
Instruction
This course aims to empower students with knowledge that underlies principles of accuracy, honesty, reproducibility, responsibility and transparency.
Instruction
After completing this section of the course you will:
- Have learned more about the various types and spread of Image Manipulation in research.
- Have learned why it is considered a serious research misconduct.
- Have practiced spotting some examples of Image Manipulation for yourself.
Instruction
Integrity Games is a research based learning platform on academic integrity. It is designed to spark interest, reflection and learning through four gamified cases and a library of central concepts.
Instruction
These instructions provide information on how to organize the work in between (face to face) group sessions.
Instruction
This series of eLearning modules provides an introduction to virtue ethics, and highlights the relevance of virtue ethics for research integrity. Learners are invited to self-assess newly gained knowledge, relate and apply the concepts in reflexive exercises, or reflect on the relevance of these concepts for their daily research practice by drawing upon their prior experience.
Instruction
This series of eLearning modules provides an introduction to the main principles of research integrity, describes the guidance outlined in the European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (ECoC), and asks you to apply the ECoC to your own context.
Instruction
This series of eLearning modules highlights the relevance of supervision, mentoring, and role-modeling in research environments and provides definitions of roles and their corresponding responsibilities.
Instruction
The objectives of the first section of this guide are:
- Knowing which principles are essential to ethically evaluate human subjects research
- Knowing the principles mentioned in the Declaration of Helsinki
- Being able to discern differences between the formulations of principles in international ethical guidance documents
- Being able to weigh and balance ethical principles in a concrete situation
Instruction
Bu bölümde bulunan talimatlar size VIRT2UE eğitiminde üzerinde durulan kavram ve konulara aşinalık kazanmanızı sağlayacak okuma ve ödevlere ilişkin genel bilgiler sunmaktadır.
Instruction
The MOOC course aims at helping PhD candidates to overcome common difficulties in the area of research integrity and to provide ideas on how to become a responsible researcher, who feels empowered by knowledge of integrity.
Instruction
Bu modülde halihazırda hâkim olan araştırma kültürünün, erdem etiği yaklaşımını baltalayacak koşullar oluşturabileceği ve araştırmacıların ahlaki açıdan uygun olmayan davranışlar geliştirmesine yol açabileceği yönündeki kaygıların üzerinde durulacaktır.
Instruction
This exercise supports participants in identifying research integrity principles, virtues and questionable research practices in a hypothetical case. It provides a framework to consider, choose and defend alternative courses of action regarding realistic research integrity dilemmas.
Instruction
Bu alıştırma, katılımcıların münazara ve diyalog yöntemlerinin ayırt edici özelliklerini ve bu iki yöntem arasındaki farkları anlamalarına ve fikir yürütme süreçlerinde kullanılan bir araç olarak diyaloğun kuvvetli ve kullanışlı yanlarını fark etmelerine yardımcı olmaktadır.
Instruction
Bu alıştırma, katılımcıların münazara ve diyalog yöntemlerinin ayırt edici özelliklerini ve bu iki yöntem arasındaki farkları anlamalarına ve fikir yürütme süreçlerinde kullanılan bir araç olarak diyaloğun kuvvetli ve kullanışlı yanlarını fark etmelerine yardımcı olmaktadır.
Instruction
Bu alıştırma, katılımcıların münazara ve diyalog yöntemlerinin ayırt edici özelliklerini ve bu iki yöntem arasındaki farkları anlamalarına ve fikir yürütme süreçlerinde kullanılan bir araç olarak diyaloğun kuvvetli ve kullanışlı yanlarını fark etmelerine yardımcı olmaktadır.
Instruction
This instruction provides you with an overview of all the necessary steps that you will need to take to organize a VIRT2UE training.
Instruction
Gereğinden fazla dürüst olmak diye bir şey mümkün müdür? Bu alıştırma, araştırma doğruluğu (AD) ile alakalı temel erdemlere ilişkin ahlaki duyarlılık geliştirmeye yardımcı olmaktadır. Bu alıştırmada özellikle belirli erdemlerin doğasında var olan ahlaki muğlaklık ve bu muğlaklığın somut araştırma pratiklerinde kendini nasıl gösterdiği üzerinde durulmaktadır.
Instruction
The objectives of this section are:
- Knowing main theories on philosophical justification of human subjects research
- Being able to argue whether and under what conditions the well-being of research participants must always take precedence over scientific interests
- Knowing how to evaluate Tuskegee from an historical perspective
- Knowing some historical scandals and cases which have led to the practice of ethically reflecting on human subjects research
- Evaluating the moral aspects of Tuskegee
Instruction
These instructions prepare you to experience the first (face to face) group sessions of the VIRT2UE blended learning program on research integrity.
Instruction
These instructions provide an overview of the readings and assignments introducing the concepts and issues addressed in the VIRT2UE training.
Instruction
The VIRT2UE project has developed videos introducing the concept of Research Integrity. These are available on The Embassy youtube channel.
Instruction
After completing this module learners will be able to: a) Identify potential risks to human research participants within the context of citizen science, and b) Understand strategies to minimize risks to research participants when practising citizen science.
Instruction
After completing this module learners will be able to understand the importance of the quality of data sets and research outputs and their responsible use in open science.
Instruction
After receiving your certificate, you will receive an invitation to register as a Research Integrity expert on the ENERI e-Community so you can be easily identified as a VIRT2UE trainer.
Instruction
These instructions provide you with information on how to prepare and experience the second (face to face) group session of the VIRT2UE training.
Instruction
The goal of this course is that PhD candidates learn how and why supervision, mentoring and collaboration are key ingredients to support Responsible Conduct in Research (RCR). At the end of the course PhD candidates will be better prepared to recognize and constructively deal with challenges that they can face when collaborating with others during their PhD research.
Instruction
After completing this module learners will be able to: a) Comprehend the role of citizen science in identifying and addressing scientific problems and societal challenges, and b) Recognize the right of citizen scientists to be acknowledged by academic scientists and society.
Instruction
After completing this module learners will be able to: a) Understand the risks to the environment, plants, animals, and ecosystems in the context of citizen science and b) Understand how to minimize risks to the environment, plants, animals, and ecosystems when practising citizen science.
Instruction
The Data in responsible conduct of research course is designed to highlight which integrity issues can rise during a research project and to promote RCR.
Instruction
The Integrity in academic publication: authorship and peer review course aims to stimulate PhD candidates to become aware of relevant issues in their academic publishing practice and ways to approach them. During this course PhD candidates will reflect on ways to be good authors and fair reviewers.
Instruction
The RCR through supervision and mentoring course is designed to stimulate supervisors to become aware of which issues are relevant in supervising and mentoring. More specifically, mentors will get a chance to reflect on research integrity within their own research practice.
Instruction
This exercise fosters reflection on the concept of goodness and how it applies in the context of research.
Instruction
Bu bölümde bulunan talimatlar, katılımcılara VIRT2UE eğitim sertifikasını nasıl alacakları hususunda bilgi vermektedir.
Instruction
The Embassy of Good Science offers to the community the first issue of the newsletter in July 2021. Here you will find the most relevant news and announcements. Concretely, the first newsletter highlights the initiatives of VIRT2UE trainers from Latvia, Ireland and the UK. Their experiences related and initiatives related to the Train-the-Trainer program are available below.
Instruction
Can you be too honest? This exercise helps to develop moral sensitivity with respect to basic virtues related to research integrity. In particular, it fosters reflection on the inherent moral ambiguity of specific virtues and how this ambiguity looks like in real-life research practice.
Instruction
This short course provides an introduction to the TRUST code, a Global Code of Conduct for Equitable Research Partnerships.
Instruction
The VIRT2UE materials are CC BY 4.0 licensed. We encourage you to use them, adapt them, and translate them into your own language.
On this page we provide instructions about how to translate the subtitles of the VIRT2UE e-learning modules.
Each course comprises of one ore more eLearning modules, of which links to documents containing the subtitles are listed separately.Instruction
The VIRT2UE materials are CC BY 4.0 licensed. We encourage you to use them, adapt them, and translate them into your own language.
On this page we provide instructions about how to translate the VIRT2UE training guide.
Instruction
Bu alıştırma, katılımcıların bir vaka bağlamında araştırma doğruluğu (AD) ile ilgili prensipleri, erdemleri ve kusurlu davranışları belirleyebilmesine yardımcı olmakta ve araştırma doğruluğuyla ilgili olarak ortaya çıkabilecek gerçekçi ikilemlerle karşı karşıya kalındığında benimsenecek alternatif eylem tarzlarını düşünme, seçme ve savunma olanağı veren bir çerçeve sunmaktadır.
Instruction
These instructions provide information on how to obtain the VIRT2UE training certificate.
Instruction
The VIRT2UE project has developed videos demonstrating the participation exercises. These are available on The Embassy youtube channel.
Instruction
A number of videos have been developed by the VIRT2UE project. These are available on The Embassy YouTube channel
Instruction
See the original version of the exercise.
Instruction
This series of eLearning modules fosters reflection on the current research culture and conditions that undermine values inherent in the scientific endeavour and make it more likely that researchers develop some vices.
Instruction
This exercise helps participants to develop approaches for implementing virtues in real life dilemmas by relating virtues to norms of action. Participants reflect on a real research integrity dilemma from different perspectives by means of dialogue.
Instruction
Diese Übung soll den Teilnehmenden dabei helfen, Ansätze für den Umgang mit moralischen Dilemmata in alltäglichen Situationen zu entwickeln. In der Übung werden dafür Werte und Tugenden mit Handlungsnormen in Verbindung gebracht. Die Teilnehmenden reflektieren im Dialog über ein reales Dilemma aus dem Wissenschaftsalltag aus verschiedenen Perspektiven.
Instruction
- To gain an understanding of what is meant by "Research Integrity".
Instruction
Bu alıştırma, iyilik kavramı ve bu kavramın araştırma konusundaki yeri üzerine fikir yürütmeyi teşvik etmektedir.
Instruction
See the related instruction on the full workshop using movie fragments (general approach).
Pages in category "Module"
The following 71 pages are in this category, out of 71 total.
1
2
3
4
5
6
- Münazara ve Diyalog
- Self Declaration Approach - a Reflection on the Varieties of Goodness in Research
- Recognition and Networking
- Ara dönem uygulama çalışması
- Erdem etiği ve araştırma doğruluğu
- 02 - The Seven Steps Method: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity
- 05 - REalistiC Decisions: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity
- Introduction to Research Integrity
- ‘And the band played on’ movie fragment no. 3
- Münazara ve Diyalog
- Uyarlanmış ikilem oyunu
7
8
9
A
- Interim Practice Work
- Modified Dilemma Game
- 01 - Value Analysis: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity
- Expert Dialogues on Pandemic Preparedness
- Der Selbstauskunfts-Ansatz: Eine Reflexion über das Konzept des Guten in der Wissenschaft
- Debate and Dialogue
- The TRUST Code in 45 Minutes
- SPOC: Integrity in academic publication: authorship and peer review
