Difference between revisions of "Resource:61d944b7-3d2a-425e-8219-c56e6ece09d9"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Resource | {{Resource | ||
|Resource Type=Cases | |Resource Type=Cases | ||
| − | |Title=The | + | |Title=The Threat to Scientific Integrity in Environmental and Occupational Medicine |
| − | |Is About= | + | |Is About=This is a factual case describing threats to the integrity of research in environmental and occupational medicine. These threats can stem from conflicts of interest between the parties funding and performing research. Pressures from some industries and governments can lead to the distortion and suppression of scientific findings, attacks on whistleblowers, and manipulation of eminent scientists<ref>Tong, Shilu, and Jørn Olsen. "The threat to scientific integrity in environmental and occupational medicine." ''Occupational and environmental medicine'' 62.12 (2005): 843-846.</ref>. |
<references /> | <references /> | ||
| − | |Important Because= | + | |Important Because=It is important for environmental and occupational medicine professionals and their societies to consider how to adequately respond to these threats. Examples include the adoption of a code of ethics by professional organisations that requires openness from public health professionals, and the establishment of an independent, intermediate funding scheme to ensure research funding for public health does not come directly from the industry to the researcher<ref>Tong, Shilu, and Jørn Olsen. "The threat to scientific integrity in environmental and occupational medicine." ''Occupational and environmental medicine'' 62.12 (2005): 843-846.</ref>.<references /> |
| − | <references /> | + | |Important For=Policy makers; Researchers; Research funding organisations |
| − | |Important For= | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Link | {{Link | ||
|Has Link=https://oem.bmj.com/content/62/12/843 | |Has Link=https://oem.bmj.com/content/62/12/843 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | {{Related To}} | + | {{Related To |
| + | |Related To Theme=Theme:6d71bd59-c3bc-4cd5-9c9f-1ab4e53fc320;Theme:7df709ce-fb89-4703-966f-b33e68b83ad5;Theme:Fe62e07c-2e75-4a55-82e6-1908fa543b7a;Theme:6f515a18-ce5f-42b0-8741-27248f6435a0;Theme:66ccb878-3c99-4e54-931d-d718bc0cb246 | ||
| + | }} | ||
{{Tags | {{Tags | ||
| + | |Involves=International Commission on Occupational Health; Union of Concerned Scientists | ||
|Has Timepoint=1955-1995 | |Has Timepoint=1955-1995 | ||
| − | |Has Location=USA | + | |Has Location=USA; United States |
| − | |Has Virtue And Value=Reliability; Honesty | + | |Has Virtue And Value=Reliability; Honesty; Autonomy |
| − | |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Falsification; Conflict of | + | |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Falsification; Independence; Conflict of Interest; Duty to Disclose Commercial Interest; Funders’ responsibilities |
| − | |Related To Research Area= | + | |Related To Research Area=LS 07.10 - Environment and health risks, occupational medicine |
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 15:32, 19 October 2020
ResourcesCases
The Threat to Scientific Integrity in Environmental and Occupational Medicine
What is this about?
This is a factual case describing threats to the integrity of research in environmental and occupational medicine. These threats can stem from conflicts of interest between the parties funding and performing research. Pressures from some industries and governments can lead to the distortion and suppression of scientific findings, attacks on whistleblowers, and manipulation of eminent scientists[1].
- ↑ Tong, Shilu, and Jørn Olsen. "The threat to scientific integrity in environmental and occupational medicine." Occupational and environmental medicine 62.12 (2005): 843-846.
Why is this important?
It is important for environmental and occupational medicine professionals and their societies to consider how to adequately respond to these threats. Examples include the adoption of a code of ethics by professional organisations that requires openness from public health professionals, and the establishment of an independent, intermediate funding scheme to ensure research funding for public health does not come directly from the industry to the researcher[1].
- ↑ Tong, Shilu, and Jørn Olsen. "The threat to scientific integrity in environmental and occupational medicine." Occupational and environmental medicine 62.12 (2005): 843-846.
