Difference between revisions of "Resource:381c1a47-2fe3-4183-b554-43ddbcf84077"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Cases |Title=A Case Study of Secondary Use of Qualitative Data |Is About=. |Important Because=. |Important For=Researchers }} {{Link |Has Link=http:/...") |
|||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Resource | {{Resource | ||
|Resource Type=Cases | |Resource Type=Cases | ||
| − | |Title=A Case Study | + | |Title=A Case Study about Anonymization and Secondary Use of Qualitative Data |
| − | |Is About=. | + | |Is About=This case study describes how secondary qualitative data can be used and how the data can be anonymized. One issue arising from anonymisation of qualitative data is losing important contextual information. Ethical, practical and theoretical questions emerge when delving into the issue of anonymization of qualitative data for secondary use. In addition, the study describes some strengths and weaknesses of anonymization policies. |
| − | |Important Because= | + | <references /> |
| − | |Important For= | + | |Important Because=The four central questions the researchers pose in the study are: |
| + | |||
| + | * "What are the alternatives to anonymization?" | ||
| + | * "What is anonymization, in the context of secondary use of qualitative data?" | ||
| + | * "How can researchers best anonymize qualitative data for secondary use?" | ||
| + | * "What is ''enough'' anonymization?" | ||
| + | |Important For=All stakeholders in research; PhD students; Junior researchers; Supervisors; Administrators | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Link | {{Link | ||
|Has Link=http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/511/1102 | |Has Link=http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/511/1102 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | {{Related To}} | + | {{Related To |
| + | |Related To Resource=Resource:43c4d969-6b45-47f1-b96b-a0da8fe7ef29;Resource:E996d601-bd6e-4f62-831c-c09f82652eb1 | ||
| + | |Related To Theme=Theme:B14a910a-3bc4-40ff-a0e6-eb7119f51ed9;Theme:61d9a3f5-8f8b-4f6f-8363-fa53f959f131 | ||
| + | }} | ||
{{Tags | {{Tags | ||
|Has Timepoint=2005 | |Has Timepoint=2005 | ||
|Has Location=Canada | |Has Location=Canada | ||
|Has Virtue And Value=Respect; Honesty | |Has Virtue And Value=Respect; Honesty | ||
| − | |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Privacy | + | |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Privacy; Anonymity; Confidentiality |
|Related To Research Area=Health sciences | |Related To Research Area=Health sciences | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 12:51, 14 October 2020
ResourcesCases
A Case Study about Anonymization and Secondary Use of Qualitative Data
What is this about?
This case study describes how secondary qualitative data can be used and how the data can be anonymized. One issue arising from anonymisation of qualitative data is losing important contextual information. Ethical, practical and theoretical questions emerge when delving into the issue of anonymization of qualitative data for secondary use. In addition, the study describes some strengths and weaknesses of anonymization policies.
Why is this important?
The four central questions the researchers pose in the study are:
- "What are the alternatives to anonymization?"
- "What is anonymization, in the context of secondary use of qualitative data?"
- "How can researchers best anonymize qualitative data for secondary use?"
- "What is enough anonymization?"
