Difference between revisions of "Resource:A100ba10-e057-410d-9c85-9ff077a5bc7f"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Cases |Title=Handling of Sexual Harassment Case Poses Larger Questions at Yale |Is About=. |Important Because=. |Important For=Researchers }} {{Link...") |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Resource Type=Cases | |Resource Type=Cases | ||
|Title=Handling of Sexual Harassment Case Poses Larger Questions at Yale | |Title=Handling of Sexual Harassment Case Poses Larger Questions at Yale | ||
| − | |Is About=. | + | |Is About=In 2014 a sexual harassment case at Yale University came to light. The case describes how a senior cardiologist made advances to a junior cardiologist. At the time, the boyfriend of the junior cardiologist worked at the same hospital, and asserts "his career stalled after [the senior cardiologist] disparaged him and froze him out professionally". <ref>Lewin, T. "Handling of sexual harassment case poses larger questions at Yale." (2018).</ref> The case enlarged the universities' lack of response and action taken to handle harassment against women. |
| − | |Important Because=. | + | |Important Because=Appropriately handling sexual harassment cases is extremely important. In addition, repercussions need to be taken when the accused is found guilty, and the victim(s) need to be protected, both personally and professionally. |
| − | |Important For=Researchers | + | |Important For=Researchers; Early career researchers; Junior researchers |
}} | }} | ||
{{Link | {{Link | ||
|Has Link=https://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/02/us/handling-of-sexual-harassment-case-poses-larger-questions-at-yale.html?_r=0 | |Has Link=https://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/02/us/handling-of-sexual-harassment-case-poses-larger-questions-at-yale.html?_r=0 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | {{Related To}} | + | {{Related To |
| + | |Related To Theme=Theme:540c9ba0-bc9c-4311-b3e1-7a650d2b9f0f;Theme:465db6f5-a17f-4bef-a776-85471fe8bcb3 | ||
| + | }} | ||
{{Tags | {{Tags | ||
| − | + | |Has Timepoint=2-11-2014; 2014 | |
| − | |Has Timepoint=2-11-2014 | + | |Has Location=USA; United States |
| − | |Has Location=USA | ||
|Has Virtue And Value=Respect | |Has Virtue And Value=Respect | ||
| − | |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Allegations of misconduct; Sexual harassment | + | |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Allegations of misconduct; Sexual harassment; Factual case |
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 10:02, 17 September 2020
ResourcesCases
Handling of Sexual Harassment Case Poses Larger Questions at Yale
What is this about?
In 2014 a sexual harassment case at Yale University came to light. The case describes how a senior cardiologist made advances to a junior cardiologist. At the time, the boyfriend of the junior cardiologist worked at the same hospital, and asserts "his career stalled after [the senior cardiologist] disparaged him and froze him out professionally". [1] The case enlarged the universities' lack of response and action taken to handle harassment against women.
Why is this important?
Appropriately handling sexual harassment cases is extremely important. In addition, repercussions need to be taken when the accused is found guilty, and the victim(s) need to be protected, both personally and professionally.
For whom is this important?
Other information
Where
Virtues & Values
Good Practices & Misconduct
- ↑ Lewin, T. "Handling of sexual harassment case poses larger questions at Yale." (2018).
