Difference between revisions of "Resource:B4dca654-60f9-4664-87f3-ae573c24fed6"

From The Embassy of Good Science
 
Line 14: Line 14:
  
 
The tools developed through this project provide practical, sector-informed guidance to support good authorship practice, encourage clear communication, and help prevent or resolve disputes.
 
The tools developed through this project provide practical, sector-informed guidance to support good authorship practice, encourage clear communication, and help prevent or resolve disputes.
|Important For=Research Integrity Officers; Research institutions; Researchers; Research Institutions and Universities; Academic administrators and research leaders; Research administrators and compliance staff; Research administrators and compliance officers; Research ethics and integrity bodies; Research integrity offices and ethics committees; students, researchers, and research ethics reviewers; Research integrity trainers
+
|Important For=Research Institutions and Universities; Research Integrity Officers; Research administrators and compliance staff; Research ethics and integrity bodies; Research integrity offices and ethics committees; Research integrity trainers; Researchers
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{Link
 
{{Link

Latest revision as of 10:50, 13 February 2026

Guidelines

UKRIO's Authorship Integrity Toolkit

What is this about?

Developed through a cross-sector project commissioned by UK Research and Innovation (UKRI), UKRIO has published a new suite of resources to support research contributors in adopting and promoting good authorship practice. The toolkit was informed by consultation with stakeholders across the research community and reflects a breadth of disciplinary and sectoral perspectives.

The toolkit includes:

  • Guidance on Good Authorship Practice
  • Model Authorship Dispute Procedure
  • Template Authorship Strategy Agreement

Why is this important?

Authorship is a highly visible and valued aspect of research. It recognises intellectual contribution, signals expertise, and shapes careers, while also strengthening collaboration and clarifying expectations across research teams.

In practice, however, authorship decisions can be complex. Unclear criteria, disciplinary differences, power imbalances, and large collaborations can lead to disputes over contribution, order, or inclusion. If unresolved, such issues can damage relationships and undermine research integrity.

The tools developed through this project provide practical, sector-informed guidance to support good authorship practice, encourage clear communication, and help prevent or resolve disputes.

For whom is this important?

Other information

Who
When
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.3.4