Difference between revisions of "Resource:729d6b14-e5f5-4dfd-94bc-b3bda16c245a"

From The Embassy of Good Science
(Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Cases |Title=Questioning a mentor |Is About=. |Important Because=. Website Fictional |Important For=Researchers }} {{Link |Has Link=https://w...")
 
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Resource
 
{{Resource
 
|Resource Type=Cases
 
|Resource Type=Cases
|Title=Questioning a mentor
+
|Title=Questioning a Mentor
|Is About=.
+
|Is About=A new graduate researcher suspects her supervisor of having falsified research for publications which were needed for his tenure. What should the researcher do? This is a fictional case.
|Important Because=.
+
|Important Because=It can be difficult for researchers to know what to do if they suspect misconduct but do not have concrete evidence. The extreme hierarchies present in scientific departments and labs can exacerbate the problem for junior researchers.
 
+
|Important For=Researchers; Early career researchers; ECR
 
 
Website
 
 
 
Fictional
 
|Important For=Researchers
 
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{Link
 
{{Link

Latest revision as of 14:25, 17 September 2020

Cases

Questioning a Mentor

What is this about?

A new graduate researcher suspects her supervisor of having falsified research for publications which were needed for his tenure. What should the researcher do? This is a fictional case.

Why is this important?

It can be difficult for researchers to know what to do if they suspect misconduct but do not have concrete evidence. The extreme hierarchies present in scientific departments and labs can exacerbate the problem for junior researchers.

For whom is this important?

Other information

Virtues & Values
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6