Latest revision as of 11:55, 10 August 2020

Resources

Cases

False results, premature infants and the CNEP trial

What is this about?

A study compared two ways of nursing premature infants who require respiratory support. False results were generated by the study. This is a factual case.

Why is this important?

In this specific context, false results mislead not only health care staff and medical researchers, but also the parents of premature babies.

For whom is this important?

Researchers

Other information

When

2000 - 2006

Where

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{Resource
 |Resource Type=Cases
-|Title=Are any of the criticisms of the CNEP trial true?
+|Title=False results, premature infants and the CNEP trial
-|Is About=This case is about false results in a scientific research which compared two ways of nursing babies with lungs so immature that most would have died without respiratory support at birth. This is a factual case.
+|Is About=A study compared two ways of nursing premature infants who require respiratory support.  False results were generated by the study. This is a factual case.
-|Important Because=These kind of false results not only mislead hospital staff and other researchers, but also parents with premature babies.
+|Important Because=In this specific context, false results mislead not only health care staff and medical researchers, but also the parents of premature babies.
 |Important For=Researchers
 }}

Difference between revisions of "Resource:639f8445-2428-41df-8784-8c1a80a110f3"