Difference between revisions of "Theme:74cc5c52-3073-4fef-8307-34a76326d665"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Theme | {{Theme | ||
|Theme Type=Good Practices | |Theme Type=Good Practices | ||
| + | |Has Parent Theme=Theme:8453f98b-244e-4147-9268-504afbe9d878 | ||
|Title=H-index | |Title=H-index | ||
| − | |Is About=The h-index, introduced by Jorge Hirsch in 2005, is a metric that conveys both the productivity and citation impact of an individual researcher <ref>Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences 2005;102(46):16569-16572.</ref> | + | |Is About=The h-index, introduced by Jorge Hirsch in 2005, is a metric that conveys both the productivity and citation impact of an individual researcher. <ref>Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences 2005;102(46):16569-16572.</ref> If a researcher has a h-index of 5 then the researcher has 5 publications with 5 or more citations. A h-index of 75 means that there are 75 publications with 75 or more citations. It thus becomes progressively more difficult to increase one’s h-index, and h-indices are exponentially distributed among scientists. |
| + | <references /> | ||
|Important Because=The h-index was partially introduced as an improvement over simply counting the quantity of a researcher’s publications. A researcher with 10 publications may have a higher h-index than a researcher with 100 publications. | |Important Because=The h-index was partially introduced as an improvement over simply counting the quantity of a researcher’s publications. A researcher with 10 publications may have a higher h-index than a researcher with 100 publications. | ||
However, as with any other metric, it is possible to ‘game’, or artificially increase, one’s h-index. Some well-established strategies include: | However, as with any other metric, it is possible to ‘game’, or artificially increase, one’s h-index. Some well-established strategies include: | ||
| − | *Self-citation (cf. Italian scientists increase self-citations in response to promotion policy | + | <br /> |
| + | |||
| + | *Self-citation (cf. Italian scientists increase self-citations in response to promotion policy <ref>Chawla DS. Italian scientists increase self-citations in response to promotion policy. 2018; Available at: <nowiki>https://www.natureindex.com/news-blog/italian-scientists-increase-self-citations-in-response-to-promotion-policy</nowiki>. Accessed 29 May, 2019.</ref> | ||
*Honorary authorship (putting a distinguished researcher on an authorship list often increases citation) | *Honorary authorship (putting a distinguished researcher on an authorship list often increases citation) | ||
*Publishing on ‘hot topics’ | *Publishing on ‘hot topics’ | ||
| Line 13: | Line 17: | ||
Any aspect of citation bias can be taken advantage of for improving h-index. | Any aspect of citation bias can be taken advantage of for improving h-index. | ||
| − | |Important For= | + | <references /> |
| − | + | |Important For=Funders; Senior researchers; Junior researchers; Early career researchers; PhD students | |
}} | }} | ||
{{Related To | {{Related To | ||
| − | |Related To Resource=Resource:5bbdd729-8f96-432a-a0ee-56510e343d01 | + | |Related To Resource=Resource:5bbdd729-8f96-432a-a0ee-56510e343d01;Resource:8be5a9b1-1c66-4659-b175-ca1e8df61047 |
| − | |Related To Theme=Theme:83f33f33-e9ba-4589-b450-92e3992a22db | + | |Related To Theme=Theme:83f33f33-e9ba-4589-b450-92e3992a22db;Theme:B84659ea-3fc8-4c93-86cf-6aa4db253ad4;Theme:8453f98b-244e-4147-9268-504afbe9d878 |
| + | }} | ||
| + | {{Tags | ||
| + | |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Publication ethics | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 16:41, 20 October 2020
ThemesH-index
What is this about?
The h-index, introduced by Jorge Hirsch in 2005, is a metric that conveys both the productivity and citation impact of an individual researcher. [1] If a researcher has a h-index of 5 then the researcher has 5 publications with 5 or more citations. A h-index of 75 means that there are 75 publications with 75 or more citations. It thus becomes progressively more difficult to increase one’s h-index, and h-indices are exponentially distributed among scientists.
- ↑ Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences 2005;102(46):16569-16572.
Why is this important?
The h-index was partially introduced as an improvement over simply counting the quantity of a researcher’s publications. A researcher with 10 publications may have a higher h-index than a researcher with 100 publications.
However, as with any other metric, it is possible to ‘game’, or artificially increase, one’s h-index. Some well-established strategies include:
- Self-citation (cf. Italian scientists increase self-citations in response to promotion policy [1]
- Honorary authorship (putting a distinguished researcher on an authorship list often increases citation)
- Publishing on ‘hot topics’
- Writing review papers (often more cited than original studies)
Any aspect of citation bias can be taken advantage of for improving h-index.
- ↑ Chawla DS. Italian scientists increase self-citations in response to promotion policy. 2018; Available at: https://www.natureindex.com/news-blog/italian-scientists-increase-self-citations-in-response-to-promotion-policy. Accessed 29 May, 2019.
For whom is this important?
The Embassy Editorial team, Iris Lechner contributed to this theme. Latest contribution was Oct 20, 2020
