Difference between revisions of "Resource:F52ff816-1035-46a4-bf92-a5f6a349f787"

From The Embassy of Good Science
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Resource
 
{{Resource
 
|Resource Type=Cases
 
|Resource Type=Cases
|Title=Editors and IRBs: Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes?
+
|Title=Ethical Issues in Developing Pharmacogenetic Research Partnerships With American Indigenous Communities
|Is About=This is a factual case.
+
|Is About=This article describes two factual cases about the use of samples collected from two American indigenous communities (NuuChah-Nulth First Nation in British Columbia, Canada and Havasupai Tribe in the US) for genetic research. In both cases consent was acquired for an initial study, but later, research samples were used for other purposes that the communities had not consented to.
|Important For=Researchers
+
|Important Because=It shows two specific cases of having informed consent about further use of research samples are taken for granted. It also provides a brief overview of the legal procedure that affected communities can follow in The United States, and possible rulling of the courte in these cases.
 +
|Important For=Researchers; Research Integrity Officers; Research Ethics Committees
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{Link
 
{{Link
|Has Link=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1460-9592.2012.03818.x
+
|Has Link=https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1038/clpt.2010.303
 +
}}
 +
{{Related To
 +
|Related To Resource=Resource:58f8a252-1eb7-42aa-8a66-31f042b632dd
 
}}
 
}}
{{Related To}}
 
 
{{Tags
 
{{Tags
|Involves=Lin L; Zhang J‐W; Huang Y
+
|Has Timepoint=2004
|Has Timepoint=2012
+
|Has Location=Canada; USA; Arizona State University
 
|Has Virtue And Value=Respect
 
|Has Virtue And Value=Respect
|Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Patient safety; Equipoise
+
|Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Informed consent; Negligence
 
|Related To Research Area=Clinical medicine
 
|Related To Research Area=Clinical medicine
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 08:26, 12 September 2020

Cases

Ethical Issues in Developing Pharmacogenetic Research Partnerships With American Indigenous Communities

What is this about?

This article describes two factual cases about the use of samples collected from two American indigenous communities (NuuChah-Nulth First Nation in British Columbia, Canada and Havasupai Tribe in the US) for genetic research. In both cases consent was acquired for an initial study, but later, research samples were used for other purposes that the communities had not consented to.

Why is this important?

It shows two specific cases of having informed consent about further use of research samples are taken for granted. It also provides a brief overview of the legal procedure that affected communities can follow in The United States, and possible rulling of the courte in these cases.

For whom is this important?

Other information

When
Virtues & Values
Good Practices & Misconduct
Research Area
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6