Difference between revisions of "Resource:53b0fc1a-fe70-48ab-9502-4d1258ac4218"

From The Embassy of Good Science
(Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Cases |Title=A University of Liverpool investigation determined that a former researcher there fabricated his data |Is About=It describes the case of...")
 
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|Resource Type=Cases
 
|Resource Type=Cases
 
|Title=A University of Liverpool investigation determined that a former researcher there fabricated his data
 
|Title=A University of Liverpool investigation determined that a former researcher there fabricated his data
|Is About=It describes the case of Daniel J. Antoine, who was a promising young liver specialist, was found to have fabricated spectroscopic findings.<ref>https://retractionwatch.com/2020/02/07/journal-flags-papers-two-years-after-university-investigation-finds-researcher-faked-data/</ref>
+
|Is About=In 2017 a promising young liver specialist, was found to have fabricated spectroscopic findings. Several retractions followed the investigation.<ref>https://retractionwatch.com/2020/02/07/journal-flags-papers-two-years-after-university-investigation-finds-researcher-faked-data/</ref>
|Important For=Researchers
+
<references />
 +
|Important Because=Revealing, investigating, reporting, and following up fraud can be resource consuming.
 +
|Important For=Researchers; PhD students
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{Link
 
{{Link
 
|Has Link=https://news.liverpool.ac.uk/2018/07/06/research-misconduct-update/
 
|Has Link=https://news.liverpool.ac.uk/2018/07/06/research-misconduct-update/
 
}}
 
}}
{{Related To}}
+
{{Related To
{{Tags}}
+
|Related To Theme=Theme:5f65272f-6e95-4768-8236-bc821a97f3d8
 +
}}
 +
{{Tags
 +
|Has Timepoint=2017
 +
|Has Location=United Kingdom
 +
|Has Virtue And Value=Diligence; Honesty; Objectivity; Reliability; Trustworthiness
 +
|Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Factual case
 +
}}

Latest revision as of 10:37, 17 September 2020

Cases

A University of Liverpool investigation determined that a former researcher there fabricated his data

What is this about?

In 2017 a promising young liver specialist, was found to have fabricated spectroscopic findings. Several retractions followed the investigation.[1]

Why is this important?

Revealing, investigating, reporting, and following up fraud can be resource consuming.

For whom is this important?

Other information

When
Good Practices & Misconduct
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6