Difference between revisions of "Resource:737c6de2-a1f3-481b-8ee1-24063bfbae1a"

From The Embassy of Good Science
(Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Guidelines |Title=The French Vademecum on Scientific Integrity |Is About=This document sets down important general principles of good research integr...")
 
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Resource
 
{{Resource
 
|Resource Type=Guidelines
 
|Resource Type=Guidelines
|Title=The French Vademecum on Scientific Integrity
+
|Title=The French Vade Mecum on Scientific Integrity
 
|Is About=This document sets down important general principles of good research integrity, what constitutes misconduct and the handling of misconduct allegations, which can be adapted to specific institutional norms. It emphasizes vigilance, prevention of misconduct and reflection over good research practices, in order to maintain high standards of integrity.
 
|Is About=This document sets down important general principles of good research integrity, what constitutes misconduct and the handling of misconduct allegations, which can be adapted to specific institutional norms. It emphasizes vigilance, prevention of misconduct and reflection over good research practices, in order to maintain high standards of integrity.
 
|Important For=Research institutions; Researchers
 
|Important For=Research institutions; Researchers
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{Link
 
{{Link
|Has Link=https://www.hceres.fr/sites/default/files/media/downloads/2017_VadeMecum_Corvol_0.pdf
+
|Has Link=https://www.ofis-france.fr/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/2017_VadeMecum_Integrite-scientifique.pdf
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{Related To
 
{{Related To

Latest revision as of 14:32, 30 October 2024

Guidelines

The French Vade Mecum on Scientific Integrity

What is this about?

This document sets down important general principles of good research integrity, what constitutes misconduct and the handling of misconduct allegations, which can be adapted to specific institutional norms. It emphasizes vigilance, prevention of misconduct and reflection over good research practices, in order to maintain high standards of integrity.

For whom is this important?

Other information

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6