Difference between revisions of "Resource:Af266b39-20a3-4b97-a876-08eebb428fe6"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
{{Related To}} | {{Related To}} | ||
{{Tags | {{Tags | ||
| + | |Involves=Marc Hauser | ||
|Has Timepoint=2002; 2010 | |Has Timepoint=2002; 2010 | ||
|Has Location=USA | |Has Location=USA | ||
Revision as of 10:35, 13 February 2020
ResourcesCases
Misconduct ruling is silent on intent
What is this about?
Mavens of research ethics often insist that there is a clear difference between sloppy science and scientific fraud. But if ever there was a case that blurs that line, it is that of Marc Hauser, a high-flying evolutionary psychologist who resigned from Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, in 2011, after the university found him guilty of misconduct[1].
Why is this important?
The definition of misconduct can be interpreted in different ways.
