Difference between revisions of "Resource:Ae70d213-bfc4-4def-b32b-ec04d8784f96"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Cases |Title=Rampant Plagiarism in Two Journals |Is About=. |Important Because=. |Important For=Researchers }} {{Link |Has Link=https://www.the-scien...") |
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Resource Type=Cases | |Resource Type=Cases | ||
|Title=Rampant Plagiarism in Two Journals | |Title=Rampant Plagiarism in Two Journals | ||
− | |Is About=. | + | |Is About=This case is about two journals, Science Reuters and Insight Knowledge, who were involved in plagiarizing scientific articles. |
− | |Important Because=. | + | |
− | |Important For=Researchers | + | |
+ | This is a factual case. | ||
+ | |Important Because=Scientific fraud is not only committed by researchers, but also publishers can be involved in plagiarism. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Website Blog (Scientist) | ||
+ | |Important For=Researchers; Journal publishers; Publishers | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Link | {{Link | ||
Line 11: | Line 17: | ||
{{Related To}} | {{Related To}} | ||
{{Tags | {{Tags | ||
+ | |Involves=Science Reuters; Insight Knowledge | ||
|Has Timepoint=22-5-2013 | |Has Timepoint=22-5-2013 | ||
− | |Has Location=USA | + | |Has Location=USA; United States |
|Has Virtue And Value=Honesty | |Has Virtue And Value=Honesty | ||
− | |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Plagiarism; Fraud | + | |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Plagiarism; Fraud; Science Publishing |
|Related To Research Area=Biological sciences | |Related To Research Area=Biological sciences | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 07:47, 18 May 2020
Resources
Cases
Rampant Plagiarism in Two Journals
What is this about?
This case is about two journals, Science Reuters and Insight Knowledge, who were involved in plagiarizing scientific articles.
Why is this important?
Scientific fraud is not only committed by researchers, but also publishers can be involved in plagiarism.