Difference between revisions of "Resource:6a4cfa90-8592-4e6f-96e6-ad4d6fb9e0fb"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Cases |Title=Criticism swirls around high-profile history book about North Korea |Is About=. |Important Because=. |Important For=Researchers }} {{Lin...") |
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Resource Type=Cases | |Resource Type=Cases | ||
|Title=Criticism swirls around high-profile history book about North Korea | |Title=Criticism swirls around high-profile history book about North Korea | ||
| − | |Is About=. | + | |Is About=This case is about Charles Armstrong who got accused of citing either irrelevant or non-existent sources to support his claims in his book 'Tyranny of the Weak'. |
| − | |Important Because=. | + | |
| + | |||
| + | This is a factual case. | ||
| + | |Important Because=It is important to be critical of the references someone uses to support his/her claims. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Website Blog (Retractionwatch) | ||
|Important For=Researchers | |Important For=Researchers | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 13: | Line 19: | ||
|Involves=Charles Armstrong | |Involves=Charles Armstrong | ||
|Has Timepoint=13-10-2016 | |Has Timepoint=13-10-2016 | ||
| − | |Has Location=USA | + | |Has Location=USA; United States |
|Has Virtue And Value=Honesty; Reliability | |Has Virtue And Value=Honesty; Reliability | ||
| − | |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Fabrication | + | |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Fabrication; Korea Retractions; Reference Problem |
|Related To Research Area=History and archaeology | |Related To Research Area=History and archaeology | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 12:23, 18 May 2020
ResourcesCases
Criticism swirls around high-profile history book about North Korea
What is this about?
This case is about Charles Armstrong who got accused of citing either irrelevant or non-existent sources to support his claims in his book 'Tyranny of the Weak'.
Why is this important?
It is important to be critical of the references someone uses to support his/her claims.
