Difference between revisions of "Resource:A5e7428e-3972-40b6-b410-cfde15e088d2"

From The Embassy of Good Science
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|Resource Type=Cases
 
|Resource Type=Cases
 
|Title=Psychiatrist Engaged in Research Misconduct, Says Gov't ...
 
|Title=Psychiatrist Engaged in Research Misconduct, Says Gov't ...
|Is About=.
+
|Is About=This case is about Alexander Neumeister, MD. In studies of anorexia, depression, and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), he misrepresented the characteristics of the subjects entered in the research using tactics such as combining data from multiple subjects to represent single subjects to justify financial payments’ and ‘changing and/or instructing his staff to change, omit, or ignore clinical and psychiatric assessment data contained in the electronic and/or written research records<ref>https://www.madinamerica.com/2019/12/psychiatrist-engaged-research-misconduct-says-govt-watchdog/</ref>.
|Important Because=.
+
 
 +
 
 +
This is a factual case.
 +
|Important Because=It is important to realise there are many ways and tactics to fake clinical data.  
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Website Blog (James Moore Blog)
 
|Important For=Researchers
 
|Important For=Researchers
 
}}
 
}}
Line 13: Line 19:
 
|Involves=Alexander Neumeister
 
|Involves=Alexander Neumeister
 
|Has Timepoint=31-12-2019
 
|Has Timepoint=31-12-2019
|Has Location=USA
+
|Has Location=USA; United States
 
|Has Virtue And Value=Honesty; Respect
 
|Has Virtue And Value=Honesty; Respect
 
|Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Grant applications
 
|Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Grant applications
 
|Related To Research Area=Clinical medicine
 
|Related To Research Area=Clinical medicine
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 08:02, 18 May 2020

Cases

Psychiatrist Engaged in Research Misconduct, Says Gov't ...

What is this about?

This case is about Alexander Neumeister, MD. In studies of anorexia, depression, and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), he misrepresented the characteristics of the subjects entered in the research using tactics such as combining data from multiple subjects to represent single subjects to justify financial payments’ and ‘changing and/or instructing his staff to change, omit, or ignore clinical and psychiatric assessment data contained in the electronic and/or written research records[1].


This is a factual case.

Why is this important?

It is important to realise there are many ways and tactics to fake clinical data.


Website Blog (James Moore Blog)

For whom is this important?

Other information

Virtues & Values
Good Practices & Misconduct
Research Area
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6