Difference between revisions of "Resource:88fb9129-4338-4bd3-a332-2e5eee03c598"

From The Embassy of Good Science
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|Resource Type=Cases
 
|Resource Type=Cases
 
|Title=What universities can learn from one of science’s biggest frauds
 
|Title=What universities can learn from one of science’s biggest frauds
|Is About=.
+
|Is About=This case is about Yoshihiro Sato, a Japanese bone-health researcher, who plagiarized work, fabricated data and forged authorships — prompting retractions of more than 60 studies in the scholarly literature so far<ref>https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-01884-2</ref>
|Important Because=.
+
 
 +
 
 +
This is a factual case.
 +
|Important Because=When the university finds out that a researcher plagiarized work, it is important that the case is investigated correctly.  
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Website
 
|Important For=Researchers
 
|Important For=Researchers
 
}}
 
}}
Line 15: Line 21:
 
|Has Location=Japan
 
|Has Location=Japan
 
|Has Virtue And Value=Reliability
 
|Has Virtue And Value=Reliability
|Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Plagiarism
+
|Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Plagiarism; Retraction
 
|Related To Research Area=Health sciences
 
|Related To Research Area=Health sciences
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 07:39, 18 May 2020

Cases

What universities can learn from one of science’s biggest frauds

What is this about?

This case is about Yoshihiro Sato, a Japanese bone-health researcher, who plagiarized work, fabricated data and forged authorships — prompting retractions of more than 60 studies in the scholarly literature so far[1]


This is a factual case.

Why is this important?

When the university finds out that a researcher plagiarized work, it is important that the case is investigated correctly.


Website

For whom is this important?

Other information

When
Where
Virtues & Values
Good Practices & Misconduct
Research Area
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6