Difference between revisions of "Resource:Ea84de30-5f0c-4fc8-a57f-e61b53d03544"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Resource Type=Cases | |Resource Type=Cases | ||
|Title=The Art and Politics of Covert Research: Doing ‘Situated Ethics’ in the Field | |Title=The Art and Politics of Covert Research: Doing ‘Situated Ethics’ in the Field | ||
| − | |Is About=This article discusses the covert research relationship. Specifically, it explores the ethical dimensions of fieldwork with reference to a six-month covert ethnography of ‘bouncers’, in Manchester<ref> | + | |Is About=This article discusses the covert research relationship. Specifically, it explores the ethical dimensions of fieldwork with reference to a six-month covert ethnography of ‘bouncers’, in Manchester<ref>Calvey, David. "The art and politics of covert research: doingsituated ethics' in the field." ''Sociology'' 42.5 (2008): 905-918.</ref>. This is a factual case. |
| − | |Important Because=The standard discourse on ethics is abstracted from the actual doing, which is a mediated and contingent set of practices.Traditionally, professional ethics has been centralized around the doctrine of informed consent with covert methodology being frowned upon and effectively marginalized as a type of ‘last resort methodology’<ref> | + | <references /> |
| − | + | |Important Because=The standard discourse on ethics is abstracted from the actual doing, which is a mediated and contingent set of practices.Traditionally, professional ethics has been centralized around the doctrine of informed consent with covert methodology being frowned upon and effectively marginalized as a type of ‘last resort methodology’<ref>Calvey, David. "The art and politics of covert research: doingsituated ethics' in the field." ''Sociology'' 42.5 (2008): 905-918.</ref>. | |
| − | + | <references /> | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|Important For=Researchers | |Important For=Researchers | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 14: | Line 11: | ||
|Has Link=https://studysites.sagepub.com/dqr4/study/Student%20resources/Chapter%2010/Calvey.pdf | |Has Link=https://studysites.sagepub.com/dqr4/study/Student%20resources/Chapter%2010/Calvey.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | {{Related To}} | + | {{Related To |
| + | |Related To Theme=Theme:9ac8c1db-f98b-41ee-858d-a8c93a647108 | ||
| + | }} | ||
{{Tags | {{Tags | ||
|Involves=David Calvey | |Involves=David Calvey | ||
Revision as of 20:21, 26 May 2020
ResourcesCases
The Art and Politics of Covert Research: Doing ‘Situated Ethics’ in the Field
What is this about?
This article discusses the covert research relationship. Specifically, it explores the ethical dimensions of fieldwork with reference to a six-month covert ethnography of ‘bouncers’, in Manchester[1]. This is a factual case.
- ↑ Calvey, David. "The art and politics of covert research: doingsituated ethics' in the field." Sociology 42.5 (2008): 905-918.
Why is this important?
The standard discourse on ethics is abstracted from the actual doing, which is a mediated and contingent set of practices.Traditionally, professional ethics has been centralized around the doctrine of informed consent with covert methodology being frowned upon and effectively marginalized as a type of ‘last resort methodology’[1].
- ↑ Calvey, David. "The art and politics of covert research: doingsituated ethics' in the field." Sociology 42.5 (2008): 905-918.
