Difference between revisions of "Resource:4c699ab2-c114-4fc0-ad52-f1917928fcad"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Resource Type=Cases | |Resource Type=Cases | ||
|Title=Collateral Damage in a Biology Institute | |Title=Collateral Damage in a Biology Institute | ||
| − | |Is About=This case is about the 'side effects' of scientific misconduct and how it affects others who are not directly involved in the case. This is a factual case. | + | |Is About=This case is about the 'side effects' of scientific misconduct and how it affects others who are not directly involved in the case. This is a factual case. The topic is stem cell research. |
|Important Because=Revelations of scientific misconduct always cause collateral damage<ref>Cyranoski, David. "Collateral damage: How one misconduct case brought a biology institute to its knees." ''Nature'' 520.7549 (2015).</ref>. | |Important Because=Revelations of scientific misconduct always cause collateral damage<ref>Cyranoski, David. "Collateral damage: How one misconduct case brought a biology institute to its knees." ''Nature'' 520.7549 (2015).</ref>. | ||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
Revision as of 15:14, 5 August 2020
ResourcesCases
Collateral Damage in a Biology Institute
What is this about?
This case is about the 'side effects' of scientific misconduct and how it affects others who are not directly involved in the case. This is a factual case. The topic is stem cell research.
Why is this important?
Revelations of scientific misconduct always cause collateral damage[1].
- ↑ Cyranoski, David. "Collateral damage: How one misconduct case brought a biology institute to its knees." Nature 520.7549 (2015).
