Difference between revisions of "Resource:77483561-dded-4881-92ee-4226bce4fc9f"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Resource Type=Cases | |Resource Type=Cases | ||
|Title=Research Integrity and Conflicts of Interest: The Case of Unethical Research-Misconduct Charges Filed by Edward Calabrese | |Title=Research Integrity and Conflicts of Interest: The Case of Unethical Research-Misconduct Charges Filed by Edward Calabrese | ||
| − | |Is About= | + | |Is About=The case discusses the relevance of better conflict of interests regulations in accepting a research misconduct allegation. An argument is provided that the U.S. research misconduct regulations are flawed in requiring research misconduct assessors/experts/accused, but not accusers, to reveal possible conflicts of interest (COI) that could affect research misconduct allegations. |
| − | |Important For=Researchers | + | |
| + | Rather than using peer-reviewed, scientific-journal literature to try to defend his account of hormesis against Shrader-Frechette’s scientific criticisms, on August 23, 2011 Calabrese instead filed RM charges against ShraderFrechette with her employer, the University of Notre Dame (UND). The UND Research Integrity Policy, like that of virtually all U.S. universities, is mandated by ORI. It requires that “upon receiving an allegation of research misconduct,” the university must “immediately assess the allegation.” Thus UND appointed a faculty committee to assess Calabrese’s allegations. | ||
| + | |Important For=Researchers; Policy makers; Research Integrity Officers | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Link | {{Link | ||
| Line 9: | Line 11: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Related To | {{Related To | ||
| − | |Related To Theme=Theme:28a0859b-9e52-4af4-97f0-b0f8eeac1f1c | + | |Related To Theme=Theme:28a0859b-9e52-4af4-97f0-b0f8eeac1f1c;Theme:6d71bd59-c3bc-4cd5-9c9f-1ab4e53fc320;Theme:0953795c-fb38-4080-a56f-fe503c4875bd |
}} | }} | ||
{{Tags | {{Tags | ||
| − | |Involves=Shrader- Frechette | + | |Involves=Shrader- Frechette; Edward Calabrese |
| − | |Has Timepoint=2000 | + | |Has Timepoint=2000; 2011 |
|Has Location=USA | |Has Location=USA | ||
| − | |Has Virtue And Value=Honesty | + | |Has Virtue And Value=Honesty; Impartiality; Transparency |
| − | |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Conflict of interest | + | |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Conflict of interest; Research Misconduct Investigation |
| − | |Related To Research Area= | + | |Related To Research Area=LS - Life Sciences; LS 08.09 - Environmental toxicology at the population and ecosystems level |
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 10:25, 8 October 2020
ResourcesCases
Research Integrity and Conflicts of Interest: The Case of Unethical Research-Misconduct Charges Filed by Edward Calabrese
What is this about?
The case discusses the relevance of better conflict of interests regulations in accepting a research misconduct allegation. An argument is provided that the U.S. research misconduct regulations are flawed in requiring research misconduct assessors/experts/accused, but not accusers, to reveal possible conflicts of interest (COI) that could affect research misconduct allegations.
Rather than using peer-reviewed, scientific-journal literature to try to defend his account of hormesis against Shrader-Frechette’s scientific criticisms, on August 23, 2011 Calabrese instead filed RM charges against ShraderFrechette with her employer, the University of Notre Dame (UND). The UND Research Integrity Policy, like that of virtually all U.S. universities, is mandated by ORI. It requires that “upon receiving an allegation of research misconduct,” the university must “immediately assess the allegation.” Thus UND appointed a faculty committee to assess Calabrese’s allegations.
