Difference between revisions of "Resource:740210e9-b695-428b-90a3-f3af7a94a174"
From The Embassy of Good Science
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Related To | {{Related To | ||
| − | |||
|Related To Theme=Theme:5f65272f-6e95-4768-8236-bc821a97f3d8;Theme:047c3bec-1747-499b-b6d5-684cbfb81edd | |Related To Theme=Theme:5f65272f-6e95-4768-8236-bc821a97f3d8;Theme:047c3bec-1747-499b-b6d5-684cbfb81edd | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 10:52, 4 August 2020
ResourcesCases
Final Findings of Scientific Misconduct
What is this about?
This case is about fabricating results in clinical examination and misrepresenting academic credentials. This is a factual case.
Why is this important?
Results from clinical trials are being used in daily clinical practice. Hence it is important that the results are correct and reliable.
