Difference between revisions of "Resource:33c02eb1-19f7-41e7-b1ca-483a330d20f1"

From The Embassy of Good Science
(Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Cases |Title=Disclosing Research Findings |Is About=The case describes a scenario where a young researcher, during his interview for a new, much-desi...")
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|Resource Type=Cases
 
|Resource Type=Cases
 
|Title=Disclosing Research Findings
 
|Title=Disclosing Research Findings
|Is About=The case describes a scenario where a young researcher, during his interview for a new, much-desired career post, and in a subsequent post-interview informal chat, is ‘pushed’ towards sharing unpublished findings and/or details of his current research team’s work.
+
|Is About=The case describes a scenario where a young researcher, during his interview for a new much-desired career post and whilst in a subsequent post-interview informal chat, is ‘pushed’ towards sharing unpublished findings and/or details of his current research team’s work.
|Important Because=This fictional case is a firm reminder of the several types of conflicts of interest one can come across in their research life. The case is presented alongside questions that provide a starting point for reflection on the dilemmas faced by researchers in relation to their contractual responsibilities as well as moral obligations when working in a team.
+
|Important Because=This fictional case is a firm reminder of the plurality of types of conflicts of interest one can come across in their research life. The case is presented alongside questions that provide a starting point for reflection on the dilemmas faced by researchers in relation to their contractual responsibilities as well as moral obligations when working in a team.
 
|Important For=Researchers
 
|Important For=Researchers
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 15:35, 26 February 2021

Cases

Disclosing Research Findings

What is this about?

The case describes a scenario where a young researcher, during his interview for a new much-desired career post and whilst in a subsequent post-interview informal chat, is ‘pushed’ towards sharing unpublished findings and/or details of his current research team’s work.

Why is this important?

This fictional case is a firm reminder of the plurality of types of conflicts of interest one can come across in their research life. The case is presented alongside questions that provide a starting point for reflection on the dilemmas faced by researchers in relation to their contractual responsibilities as well as moral obligations when working in a team.

For whom is this important?

Other information

Virtues & Values
Good Practices & Misconduct
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6