Difference between revisions of "Resource:C6893d43-209b-456a-b5f9-e059227155ef"
From The Embassy of Good Science
(Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Cases |Title=Definition of plagiarism: Phrasing |Is About=This is a fictional case of a novice reviewer who, in writing her first book review, used h...") |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|Is About=This is a fictional case of a novice reviewer who, in writing her first book review, used her own substantive ideas but relied heavily on borrowing identical sentences and phrases from a professor’s published review. The professor whose review has been heavily plagiarised alerted the journal. | |Is About=This is a fictional case of a novice reviewer who, in writing her first book review, used her own substantive ideas but relied heavily on borrowing identical sentences and phrases from a professor’s published review. The professor whose review has been heavily plagiarised alerted the journal. | ||
|Important Because=The case delivers yet another example of the many formats that plagiarism can take (see also Loui, 2002)<ref>Loui, M.C. (2002). Seven Ways to Plagiarize: Handling Real Allegations of Research Misconduct, ''Science and Engineering Ethics'' 8: 529–539.</ref>. It is also a reminder of how easily and, often unintentional, breech of ethical guidelines can occur, especially by those less experienced in a field. | |Important Because=The case delivers yet another example of the many formats that plagiarism can take (see also Loui, 2002)<ref>Loui, M.C. (2002). Seven Ways to Plagiarize: Handling Real Allegations of Research Misconduct, ''Science and Engineering Ethics'' 8: 529–539.</ref>. It is also a reminder of how easily and, often unintentional, breech of ethical guidelines can occur, especially by those less experienced in a field. | ||
| + | <references /> | ||
|Important For=Authors; Journal editors; Journal publishers; Junior researchers; Early career researchers | |Important For=Authors; Journal editors; Journal publishers; Junior researchers; Early career researchers | ||
|Has Best Practice=The case provides some ideas of best practices in order to avoid such plagiarism allegations: | |Has Best Practice=The case provides some ideas of best practices in order to avoid such plagiarism allegations: | ||
| Line 14: | Line 15: | ||
|Has Link=https://www.asanet.org/teaching-learning/faculty/teaching-ethics-throughout-curriculum/case-67-definition-plagiarism-phrasing | |Has Link=https://www.asanet.org/teaching-learning/faculty/teaching-ethics-throughout-curriculum/case-67-definition-plagiarism-phrasing | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | {{Related To}} | + | {{Related To |
| + | |Related To Theme=Theme:02592695-e4f8-473c-a944-adfe0d8094c0 | ||
| + | }} | ||
{{Tags | {{Tags | ||
|Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Plagiarism | |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Plagiarism | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 16:15, 26 February 2021
ResourcesCases
Definition of plagiarism: Phrasing
What is this about?
This is a fictional case of a novice reviewer who, in writing her first book review, used her own substantive ideas but relied heavily on borrowing identical sentences and phrases from a professor’s published review. The professor whose review has been heavily plagiarised alerted the journal.
Why is this important?
The case delivers yet another example of the many formats that plagiarism can take (see also Loui, 2002)[1]. It is also a reminder of how easily and, often unintentional, breech of ethical guidelines can occur, especially by those less experienced in a field.
- ↑ Loui, M.C. (2002). Seven Ways to Plagiarize: Handling Real Allegations of Research Misconduct, Science and Engineering Ethics 8: 529–539.
For whom is this important?
What are the best practices?
The case provides some ideas of best practices in order to avoid such plagiarism allegations:
a) Create your own review model after you have read a number of different review examples, rather heavily relying on one single example
b) Acknowledge that the book review model used relies heavily on XX’s review by referencing appropriately
