Difference between revisions of "Resource:9315d10d-54d0-4ae5-a30d-f9530aa62377"
From The Embassy of Good Science
(Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Cases |Title=Duty to Report Ethical Violations of Others |Is About=This is a fictional case of a graduate research assistant’s dilemma of raising h...") |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
{{Related To | {{Related To | ||
|Related To Resource=Resource:9a3c7e5f-08d6-4de7-9acd-8304127300a3 | |Related To Resource=Resource:9a3c7e5f-08d6-4de7-9acd-8304127300a3 | ||
| + | |Related To Theme=Theme:Fe62e07c-2e75-4a55-82e6-1908fa543b7a | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Tags | {{Tags | ||
Latest revision as of 18:15, 26 February 2021
ResourcesCases
Duty to Report Ethical Violations of Others
What is this about?
This is a fictional case of a graduate research assistant’s dilemma of raising his suspicions of data duplication in a professor’s team under whose grant he works.
Why is this important?
This case raises the question of when does one act with integrity in research? And where does one’s responsibility lie when it comes to research violations performed by others?
It is also a firm reminder of the different power dynamics and positions held in an institution when it comes to reporting misconduct or, as in this case, whistleblowing.
