Difference between revisions of "Resource:33c02eb1-19f7-41e7-b1ca-483a330d20f1"
From The Embassy of Good Science
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
{{Tags | {{Tags | ||
|Has Virtue And Value=Reliability | |Has Virtue And Value=Reliability | ||
| − | |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Confidentiality; | + | |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Confidentiality; Conflict of interests |
|Related To Research Area=PE - Physical Sciences and Engineering | |Related To Research Area=PE - Physical Sciences and Engineering | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 16:18, 6 April 2021
ResourcesCases
Disclosing Research Findings
What is this about?
The case describes a scenario where a young researcher, during his interview for a new much-desired career post and whilst in a subsequent post-interview informal chat, is ‘pushed’ towards sharing unpublished findings and/or details of his current research team’s work.
Why is this important?
This fictional case is a firm reminder of the plurality of types of conflicts of interest one can come across in their research life. The case is presented alongside questions that provide a starting point for reflection on the dilemmas faced by researchers in relation to their contractual responsibilities as well as moral obligations when working in a team.
