Difference between revisions of "Instruction:379346fc-d254-467f-99be-41b1cea1c817"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
{{Instruction Step Trainee | {{Instruction Step Trainee | ||
|Instruction Step Title=Debate & Dialogue | |Instruction Step Title=Debate & Dialogue | ||
− | |Instruction Step Text= | + | |Instruction Step Text=This exercise supports users in identifying the features of and differences between debate and dialogue and in becoming aware of the strengths and usefulness of dialogue as a tool for reflection processes. |
[[File:D&D2.png |link=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=249umsbOIG0&list=PLabbUwyulAry4tzZ12eHl5JOJhJGiaE6k&index=4]]}} | [[File:D&D2.png |link=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=249umsbOIG0&list=PLabbUwyulAry4tzZ12eHl5JOJhJGiaE6k&index=4]]}} | ||
{{Instruction Step Trainee | {{Instruction Step Trainee | ||
|Instruction Step Title=Virtues & Norms | |Instruction Step Title=Virtues & Norms | ||
− | |Instruction Step Text= | + | |Instruction Step Text= This exercise helps to develop approaches for implementing virtues in real life dilemmas by relating virtues to norms of action while reflecting on a real RI dilemma from different perspectives by means of dialogue. |
[[File: V&N.png|link=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IZMDWGTLXWo&list=PLabbUwyulAry4tzZ12eHl5JOJhJGiaE6k&index=2]] | [[File: V&N.png|link=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IZMDWGTLXWo&list=PLabbUwyulAry4tzZ12eHl5JOJhJGiaE6k&index=2]] | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
{{Instruction Step Trainee | {{Instruction Step Trainee | ||
|Instruction Step Title=The Middle Position | |Instruction Step Title=The Middle Position | ||
− | |Instruction Step Text= | + | |Instruction Step Text= Can you be too honest? This exercise helps to develop moral sensitivity with respect to basic virtues related to Research Integrity (RI). In particular it fosters reflection on the inherent moral ambiguity of specific virtues and how this ambiguity looks like in concrete research practice. |
[[File: MPE.png|link=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjov1WIvKvg&list=PLabbUwyulAry4tzZ12eHl5JOJhJGiaE6k&index=5]] | [[File: MPE.png|link=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjov1WIvKvg&list=PLabbUwyulAry4tzZ12eHl5JOJhJGiaE6k&index=5]] | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Instruction Step Trainee | {{Instruction Step Trainee | ||
|Instruction Step Title=Modified Dilemma Game | |Instruction Step Title=Modified Dilemma Game | ||
− | |Instruction Step Text=. | + | |Instruction Step Text= This exercise supports participants in identifying research integrity (RI) principles, virtues and misconduct in a case and provides a framework to consider, choose and defend alternative courses of action regarding realistic dilemmas in research integrity. |
[[File: DGE.png|link=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qpq-oWPdvJQ&list=PLabbUwyulAry4tzZ12eHl5JOJhJGiaE6k&index=6]] | [[File: DGE.png|link=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qpq-oWPdvJQ&list=PLabbUwyulAry4tzZ12eHl5JOJhJGiaE6k&index=6]] | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Instruction Step Trainee | {{Instruction Step Trainee | ||
|Instruction Step Title= Self Declaration Approach - a Reflection on the Varieties of Goodness in Research | |Instruction Step Title= Self Declaration Approach - a Reflection on the Varieties of Goodness in Research | ||
− | |Instruction Step Text= | + | |Instruction Step Text= This exercise fosters reflection on the concept of goodness and how it applies in the context of research. |
[[File: VGE.png|link=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYJY50PRLvo&list=PLabbUwyulAry4tzZ12eHl5JOJhJGiaE6k&index=3]] | [[File: VGE.png|link=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYJY50PRLvo&list=PLabbUwyulAry4tzZ12eHl5JOJhJGiaE6k&index=3]] | ||
Latest revision as of 14:31, 31 May 2021
Instructions
VIRT2UE Train-the-Trainer program
Instructions for:TraineeTrainer
Goal
The VIRT2UE project has developed videos demonstrating the participation exercises. These are available on The Embassy youtube channel.
Duration (hours)
1
For whom is this important?
1
2
3
The Middle Position
Can you be too honest? This exercise helps to develop moral sensitivity with respect to basic virtues related to Research Integrity (RI). In particular it fosters reflection on the inherent moral ambiguity of specific virtues and how this ambiguity looks like in concrete research practice.
4
Steps