Difference between revisions of "Resource:E11c2017-febf-4986-a02a-4d6d9599d21a"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
{{Related To}} | {{Related To}} | ||
{{Tags | {{Tags | ||
| + | |Has Timepoint=2003-2004 | ||
|Has Location=United Kingdom | |Has Location=United Kingdom | ||
|Has Virtue And Value=Honesty | |Has Virtue And Value=Honesty | ||
Revision as of 14:59, 10 February 2020
ResourcesCases
Author misconduct: Not just the editors' responsibility
What is this about?
Researchers everywhere are under increasing pressure to publish in high quality journals. The amount of space available in a journal such as Medical Education has not kept pace with the rise in submissions. Against a background of fierce competition, authors sometimes cut corners. This may lead to misconduct[1].
Why is this important?
This paper aims to explore the most common types of publication misconduct seen in the Medical Education editorial office, and to consider the reasons for this and the implications for researchers in the field[1].
