Difference between revisions of "Guide:F09d96da-448d-4e4b-99cb-612231b0b993"
| Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
|Guide Step Type Trainee=Instruction | |Guide Step Type Trainee=Instruction | ||
|Guide Step Element=Instruction:9b5b6402-1f9c-4433-b431-def307d04db0 | |Guide Step Element=Instruction:9b5b6402-1f9c-4433-b431-def307d04db0 | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | {{Guide Step Trainee | ||
| + | |Guide Step Type Trainee=Instruction | ||
| + | |Guide Step Element=Instruction:Ab0fdd94-d3a2-40ba-a77a-b3bf46bbe346 | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Guide Step Trainee | {{Guide Step Trainee | ||
| Line 95: | Line 99: | ||
|Guide Step Type Trainee=Instruction | |Guide Step Type Trainee=Instruction | ||
|Guide Step Element=Instruction:F00721f3-6c64-4b3f-b35a-aa2ff4ef3373 | |Guide Step Element=Instruction:F00721f3-6c64-4b3f-b35a-aa2ff4ef3373 | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | {{Guide Step Trainee | ||
| + | |Guide Step Type Trainee=Instruction | ||
| + | |Guide Step Element=Instruction:8671603d-f1fd-4e1a-bd10-845bd836a6e1 | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | {{Guide Step Trainee | ||
| + | |Guide Step Type Trainee=Instruction | ||
| + | |Guide Step Element=Instruction:204295c1-8ff0-4ca1-bfb4-4cf4e703c03c | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Guide Step Trainee | {{Guide Step Trainee | ||
|Guide Step Type Trainee=Instruction | |Guide Step Type Trainee=Instruction | ||
|Guide Step Element=Instruction:2ca0469a-4ffe-4810-bf04-c5816844a37c | |Guide Step Element=Instruction:2ca0469a-4ffe-4810-bf04-c5816844a37c | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | {{Guide Step Trainee | ||
| + | |Guide Step Type Trainee=Instruction | ||
| + | |Guide Step Element=Instruction:Dcad977e-3564-4a76-8ea0-ee15a8b391a6 | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Guide Step Trainee | {{Guide Step Trainee | ||
Revision as of 10:49, 16 January 2026
Sustainability and Eco-Justice in Everyday Research - RE4GREEN
Research shapes the world – not just through big discoveries, but through the everyday choices we make: what questions we ask, which methods we use, how we share our work. The RE4GREEN micromodules can be used individually or together to guide students, researchers, citizen scientists, people reviewing research proposals and those teaching research ethics on how to embed sustainability and eco-justice knowledge, skills and values in research.
Related Initiative
Sustainability and Eco-Justice in Everyday Research
- Understand the concept of environmental justice
- Recognize how environmental harms and benefits are often distributed unequally across different communities.
- Reflect on the responsibility researchers hold in shaping sustainable and fair outcomes and how disparities may arise within the context of their own research or professional practice.
- Describe five key ethical principles related to Environmental Justice and their implications for research practice: 1) Leave No One Behind; 2) Do No Significant Harm (DNSH); 3) Precautionary Principle; 4) Polluter Pays Principle; 5) Informed consent
- Apply each principle to one’s own research practice.
- Understand the role of ecofeminist principles in research;
- Apply relevant ecofeminist principles to various research dilemmas.
- Explain how environmental degradation affects human health through the framework of planetary boundaries
- Identify the disproportionate effects of climate change on different populations.
- Reflect on the ethical implications of environmental injustices.
- Relate the concept of planetary health to research responsibilities.
- Understand core ethics of care concepts and their basis in feminist and indigenous philosophies
- Identify care-based practices in your own research setting
- Propose strategies for strengthening care-based and environmentally aware practices in your own research and research setting.
Embracing Complexity
By the end of the module participants will be able to:
- Understand the wicked nature of sustainability and recognize the complexity of balancing environmental, social, and economic dimensions in engineering decisions.
- Apply transversal skills — Perspective Taking, Systems Thinking, and Negotiation — to analyze and solve complex sustainability challenges in engineering contexts.
- Evaluate material and design choices considering environmental impacts, societal wellbeing, and ethical responsibilities to promote sustainable engineering practices.
- Reflect on the broader responsibilities of engineers in creating solutions that are socially responsible, environmentally sound, and technically effective.
- Identify and distinguish key types of justice (e.g., recognition, spatial, distributive, epistemic, intergenerational) that shape environmental justice debates.
- Recognize how certain green initiatives overlook broader social and historical contexts.
By the end of the module, participants should be able to:
- Identify systemic factors (e.g., public policy, health equity, urban inequality) that shape research impacts and responsibilities.
- Map research linkages to climate justice, interspecies justice, and gendered (urban) contexts using the “Crisis Tree”.
- Articulate how their research connects with environmental and climate justice using intersectionality-based thinking.
By the end of the module, participants should be able to:
- Identify systemic factors (e.g., public policy, health equity, urban inequality) that shape research impacts and responsibilities.
- Map research linkages to climate justice, interspecies justice, and gendered (urban) contexts using the “Crisis Tree”.
- Articulate how their research connects with environmental and climate justice using intersectionality-based thinking.
- Identify and reflect on intersectional dimensions (e.g. gender, race, class, disability) in climate and health research.
- Explore how power and privilege operate in environmental and health research design and policy influence.
- Formulate more inclusive and socially just research questions using reflexive prompts.
- Evaluate different approaches to research design in terms of fairness, inclusivity, and responsiveness to underrepresented communities.
- Apply responsible research methods in citizen science or community engagement in climate-affected contexts.
- Evaluate different approaches to research design in terms of fairness, inclusivity, and responsiveness to underrepresented communities.
- Apply responsible research methods in citizen science or community engagement in climate-affected contexts.
By the end of this module participants should be able to:
- Understand the concept of circularity and explain its relevance to sustainable research and innovation.
- Identify and apply the 9R strategies (Refuse, Rethink, Reduce, Reuse, Repair, Refurbish, Remanufacture, Repurpose, Recycle) in practical contexts.
- Develop systems thinking and adaptability skills to analyze how circularity influences research, innovation, and design decisions.
- Integrate circular principles into their professional activities to promote sustainability and resource efficiency.
- Identify key environmental and climate impacts associated with technology.
- Distinguish between “greening by technology” and “greening of technology.”
- Apply practical design principles for more sustainable technology.
- Reflect on how sustainability considerations apply to their own research or innovation practices.
- Evaluate the ethical and social implications of sustainable technology choices
- Describe the advantages of NBS for research and innovation and differentiate from greenwashing.
- Reflect on a case study that applies multispecies thinking to urban design.
- Consider how you could apply these insights to your research and innovation projects.
This micromodule builds on the content of the fourth episode of “Earth to Research”, titled “Planetary Health (Part One): Expelling Shell”. This training activity helps learners critically reflect on the podcast’s insights and apply them to their own research practices, values, and ethical choices. By the end of this micromodule, learners should be able to:
- Explain how gender and intersectionality shape health outcomes and vulnerabilities in the context of climate change and planetary health
- Analyse how dominant research paradigms produce knowledge gaps and perpetuate inequalities in health research.
- Reflect on the ethical responsibilities and potential roles of researchers and students in responding to climate injustice and institutional collaborations with harmful industries.
- Apply individual strategies to engage with complex and emotionally challenging topics related to climate change, health, and social justice.
- Explain how environmental degradation affects human health through the framework of planetary boundaries
- Identify the disproportionate effects of climate change on different populations.
- Reflect on the ethical implications of environmental injustices.
- Relate the concept of planetary health to research responsibilities.
Envisioning sustainable futures
By the end of the module participants should be able to:
- Recognize the significant differences between growth-oriented and post-growth-oriented innovation.
- Identify and understand the core values associated with each orientation.
- Reflect on the role of each approach to innovation in relation to sustainability.
- Assess the broader social significance of both approaches to innovation.
- Identify key environmental impacts of AI technologies
- Explain how AI’s infrastructure contributes to climate and environmental pressures
- Reflect on trade-offs and future governance needs regarding AI deployment
By the end of this module, participants should be able to:
- Recognise the paradigm shift from extractivist/anthropocentric logics to relational, ecocentric orientations.
- Reflect on their own positionality and role as planetary stewards.
- Explore the role of emotion, compassion, and plural knowledge systems in transforming research and education practices.
- Identify actions to support inclusive, just, and relational planetary health education
- Explain the concept of transformative research—including how research can contribute not only to knowledge production but to societal change.
- Describe the PePe framework (Pluralizing, Empowering, Politicizing, Embedding) and its relevance for advancing more just and impactful research practices.
- Apply the PEPE framework to their own research practices and systems.
- Critically evaluate their role as researchers, including ethical responsibilities, boundary work, and potential influence on change.
- Identify ethical tensions in their own research ecosystems by reflecting on who benefits, who pays the price and what is left unseen or unaddressed
- Use imagination and analogy as tools to surface inner dynamics, silenced voices, and neglected consequences in research systems and practices.
- Critically evaluate their role as researchers not only as knowledge producers but as moral and political actors.
- Explain how sustainability and ecological issues extend beyond technological solutions and require social, cultural and epistemic change.
- Recognize degrowth as a plural, evolving critique of endless economic growth.
- Reflect on how art–science collaborations can foster new narratives, empathy, uncertainty, and ethical awareness in research practice.
- Identify ways in which reflexivity, care, storytelling and plurality of knowledge can reshape research design and engagement with the environment.
Acting for sustainability
- Develop a tailored climate communication strategy for their research environment (department, group, project).
- Explore practical ways to implement small but impactful behavioral changes that promote sustainability within academic culture.
- Apply core sustainability values when planning and delivering events or conferences in their field.
- Identify different types of plastic materials in a lab.
- Describe actionable steps for managing and recycling plastics in a lab.
- Reflect on the challenges of developing a recycling pipeline for plastic waste in a lab.
By the end of this activity, participants should be able to:
- Identify daily small actions that can be undertaken to make labs more environmentally friendly.
- Examine the case of inefficient energy use in labs to identify underlying causes and propose improvement strategies.
- Reflect on how changes towards sustainable management should be implemented
