Difference between revisions of "Resource:B4dca654-60f9-4664-87f3-ae573c24fed6"
From The Embassy of Good Science
(Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Guidelines |Title=UKRIO's Guide to good authorship practice in research |Is About=One of the main goals of research is to disseminate research result...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Resource | {{Resource | ||
|Resource Type=Guidelines | |Resource Type=Guidelines | ||
| − | |Title=UKRIO's | + | |Title=UKRIO's Authorship Integrity Toolkit |
| − | |Is About= | + | |Is About=Developed through a cross-sector project commissioned by UK Research and Innovation (UKRI), UKRIO has published a new suite of resources to support research contributors in adopting and promoting good authorship practice. The toolkit was informed by consultation with stakeholders across the research community and reflects a breadth of disciplinary and sectoral perspectives. |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | The toolkit includes: | |
| − | - | + | * Guidance on Good Authorship Practice |
| + | * Model Authorship Dispute Procedure | ||
| + | * Template Authorship Strategy Agreement | ||
| + | |Important Because=Authorship is a highly visible and valued aspect of research. It recognises intellectual contribution, signals expertise, and shapes careers, while also strengthening collaboration and clarifying expectations across research teams. | ||
| + | |||
| + | In practice, however, authorship decisions can be complex. Unclear criteria, disciplinary differences, power imbalances, and large collaborations can lead to disputes over contribution, order, or inclusion. If unresolved, such issues can damage relationships and undermine research integrity. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The tools developed through this project provide practical, sector-informed guidance to support good authorship practice, encourage clear communication, and help prevent or resolve disputes. | ||
| + | |Important For=Research Integrity Officers; Research institutions; Researchers; Research Institutions and Universities; Academic administrators and research leaders; Research administrators and compliance staff; Research administrators and compliance officers; Research ethics and integrity bodies; Research integrity offices and ethics committees; students, researchers, and research ethics reviewers; Research integrity trainers | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Link | {{Link | ||
| − | |Has Link=https://ukrio.org/ | + | |Has Link=https://ukrio.org/resources/the-authorship-integrity-toolkit/ |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
}} | }} | ||
| + | {{Related To}} | ||
{{Tags | {{Tags | ||
|Involves=UKRIO | |Involves=UKRIO | ||
| − | |Has Timepoint= | + | |Has Timepoint=2025 |
|Has Location=United Kingdom | |Has Location=United Kingdom | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 10:49, 13 February 2026
ResourcesGuidelines
UKRIO's Authorship Integrity Toolkit
What is this about?
Developed through a cross-sector project commissioned by UK Research and Innovation (UKRI), UKRIO has published a new suite of resources to support research contributors in adopting and promoting good authorship practice. The toolkit was informed by consultation with stakeholders across the research community and reflects a breadth of disciplinary and sectoral perspectives.
The toolkit includes:
- Guidance on Good Authorship Practice
- Model Authorship Dispute Procedure
- Template Authorship Strategy Agreement
Why is this important?
Authorship is a highly visible and valued aspect of research. It recognises intellectual contribution, signals expertise, and shapes careers, while also strengthening collaboration and clarifying expectations across research teams.
In practice, however, authorship decisions can be complex. Unclear criteria, disciplinary differences, power imbalances, and large collaborations can lead to disputes over contribution, order, or inclusion. If unresolved, such issues can damage relationships and undermine research integrity.
The tools developed through this project provide practical, sector-informed guidance to support good authorship practice, encourage clear communication, and help prevent or resolve disputes.For whom is this important?
Research Integrity OfficersResearch institutionsResearchersResearch Institutions and UniversitiesAcademic administrators and research leadersResearch administrators and compliance staffResearch administrators and compliance officersResearch ethics and integrity bodiesResearch integrity offices and ethics committeesstudents, researchers, and research ethics reviewersResearch integrity trainers
