Difference between revisions of "Resource:4be659bc-2261-4e62-b4ed-d746e9f2c5be"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|Is About=Data falsification in a series of studies which showed that lumpectomy was as effective as removing the entire breast for preventing recurrence in many women with early cancer. | |Is About=Data falsification in a series of studies which showed that lumpectomy was as effective as removing the entire breast for preventing recurrence in many women with early cancer. | ||
|Important Because=To give insight in different ways of cheating in clinical trials. | |Important Because=To give insight in different ways of cheating in clinical trials. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Journal | ||
| + | |||
| + | Factual | ||
|Important For=researchers; research leaders; All stakeholders in research; phd students | |Important For=researchers; research leaders; All stakeholders in research; phd students | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 14:07, 28 April 2020
ResourcesCases
Scientist ousted from cancer study declines to testify to House panel
What is this about?
Data falsification in a series of studies which showed that lumpectomy was as effective as removing the entire breast for preventing recurrence in many women with early cancer.
Why is this important?
To give insight in different ways of cheating in clinical trials.
Journal
