Difference between revisions of "Resource:2958e5c9-7d9e-44c9-aca0-7e3c0ad7afe8"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Cases |Title=Florida researcher “cherry picked” data, university investigation finds |Is About=. |Important Because=. |Important For=Researchers...") |
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Resource Type=Cases | |Resource Type=Cases | ||
|Title=Florida researcher “cherry picked” data, university investigation finds | |Title=Florida researcher “cherry picked” data, university investigation finds | ||
− | |Is About=. | + | |Is About=This case is about Huabei Jiang, a professor of biomedical engineering, and Lei Yao, a former postdoc and scientist, whose paper got retracted because only certain data points were reported that supported the paper's conclusion. |
− | |Important Because=. | + | |
+ | |||
+ | This is a factual case. | ||
+ | |Important Because=Scientific fraud is not only presenting false data, but also publishing only parts of the available data. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Website Blog (Retractionwatch) | ||
|Important For=Researchers | |Important For=Researchers | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 13: | Line 19: | ||
|Involves=Huabei Jiang; Lei Yao | |Involves=Huabei Jiang; Lei Yao | ||
|Has Timepoint=24-10-2017 | |Has Timepoint=24-10-2017 | ||
− | |Has Location=USA | + | |Has Location=USA; United States |
|Has Virtue And Value=Honesty | |Has Virtue And Value=Honesty | ||
− | |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Cherry picking | + | |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Cherry picking; Misconduct Investigations; Physics Retractions; Data Issues |
|Related To Research Area=Medical engineering; Physical sciences | |Related To Research Area=Medical engineering; Physical sciences | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 10:34, 18 May 2020
Resources
Cases
Florida researcher “cherry picked” data, university investigation finds
What is this about?
This case is about Huabei Jiang, a professor of biomedical engineering, and Lei Yao, a former postdoc and scientist, whose paper got retracted because only certain data points were reported that supported the paper's conclusion.
Why is this important?
Scientific fraud is not only presenting false data, but also publishing only parts of the available data.