Difference between revisions of "Resource:Adad1721-62c8-46fd-83f9-617770437d90"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Cases |Title=Philosopher earns 14th retraction for plagiarism |Is About=. |Important Because=. |Important For=Researchers }} {{Link |Has Link=http://...") |
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Resource Type=Cases | |Resource Type=Cases | ||
|Title=Philosopher earns 14th retraction for plagiarism | |Title=Philosopher earns 14th retraction for plagiarism | ||
| − | |Is About=. | + | |Is About=This case is about Martin W. F. Stone, a philosophy professor at the University of Leuven. In 2010 an investigation found that his work is highly questionable in terms of scientific integrity. He had 14 retractions<ref>http://retractionwatch.com/2016/06/08/philosopher-earns-13th-retraction-for-plagiarism/</ref>. |
| − | |Important Because=. | + | |
| + | |||
| + | This is a factual case. | ||
| + | |Important Because=When an author had a lot of retractions, one should be questioning his/her reliability. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Website Blog (Retractionwatch) | ||
|Important For=Researchers | |Important For=Researchers | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 15: | Line 21: | ||
|Has Location=Belgium | |Has Location=Belgium | ||
|Has Virtue And Value=Honesty | |Has Virtue And Value=Honesty | ||
| − | |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Plagiarism | + | |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Plagiarism; Springer Retractions; Wiley Retractions |
|Related To Research Area=Philosophy, ethics and religion | |Related To Research Area=Philosophy, ethics and religion | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 12:06, 18 May 2020
ResourcesCases
Philosopher earns 14th retraction for plagiarism
What is this about?
This case is about Martin W. F. Stone, a philosophy professor at the University of Leuven. In 2010 an investigation found that his work is highly questionable in terms of scientific integrity. He had 14 retractions[1].
Why is this important?
When an author had a lot of retractions, one should be questioning his/her reliability.
