Difference between revisions of "Resource:740210e9-b695-428b-90a3-f3af7a94a174"

From The Embassy of Good Science
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Resource
 
{{Resource
 
|Resource Type=Cases
 
|Resource Type=Cases
|Title=Final findings of scientific misconduct
+
|Title=Final Findings of Scientific Misconduct
|Is About=This case is about fabricating results in clinical examination and misrepresenting academic credentials.
+
|Is About=This case is about fabricating results in clinical examination and misrepresenting academic credentials. This is a factual case.
 
|Important Because=Results from clinical trials are being used in daily clinical practice. Hence it is important that the results are correct and reliable.
 
|Important Because=Results from clinical trials are being used in daily clinical practice. Hence it is important that the results are correct and reliable.
 
 
Journal
 
 
Factual
 
 
|Important For=Researchers
 
|Important For=Researchers
 
}}
 
}}
Line 14: Line 9:
 
|Has Link=https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/not94-244.html
 
|Has Link=https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/not94-244.html
 
}}
 
}}
{{Related To}}
+
{{Related To
 +
|Related To Theme=Theme:5f65272f-6e95-4768-8236-bc821a97f3d8;Theme:047c3bec-1747-499b-b6d5-684cbfb81edd
 +
}}
 
{{Tags
 
{{Tags
 
|Involves=Annmarie Surprenant
 
|Involves=Annmarie Surprenant

Revision as of 14:34, 26 May 2020

Cases

Final Findings of Scientific Misconduct

What is this about?

This case is about fabricating results in clinical examination and misrepresenting academic credentials. This is a factual case.

Why is this important?

Results from clinical trials are being used in daily clinical practice. Hence it is important that the results are correct and reliable.

For whom is this important?

Other information

Virtues & Values
Good Practices & Misconduct
Research Area
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6