Difference between revisions of "Resource:840c6a43-e373-4927-ae94-f4f583535a2e"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Resource | {{Resource | ||
|Resource Type=Cases | |Resource Type=Cases | ||
| − | |Title= | + | |Title=The Ethics of Public Health Research on Less Expensive, Less Effective Interventions |
| − | |Is About= | + | |Is About=The Kennedy Krieger lead paint study stirred controversial questions about whether research designed to develop less expensive interventions that are not as effective as existing treatments can be ethically warranted<ref>Buchanan, David R., and Franklin G. Miller. "Justice and fairness in the Kennedy Krieger Institute lead paint study: the ethics of public health research on less expensive, less effective interventions." ''American journal of public health'' 96.5 (2006): 781-787.</ref>. This is a factual case. |
| − | |Important Because=Critics questioned the social value of such research and alleged that it sanctions a double standard, exploits participants, and is complicit in perpetuating the social injustice<ref> | + | <references /> |
| − | + | |Important Because=Critics questioned the social value of such research and alleged that it sanctions a double standard, exploits participants, and is complicit in perpetuating the social injustice<ref>Buchanan, David R., and Franklin G. Miller. "Justice and fairness in the Kennedy Krieger Institute lead paint study: the ethics of public health research on less expensive, less effective interventions." ''American journal of public health'' 96.5 (2006): 781-787.</ref>. | |
| − | + | <references /> | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|Important For=Researchers | |Important For=Researchers | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 14: | Line 11: | ||
|Has Link=https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/10.2105/AJPH.2005.063719 | |Has Link=https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/10.2105/AJPH.2005.063719 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | {{Related To}} | + | {{Related To |
| + | |Related To Theme=Theme:9ac8c1db-f98b-41ee-858d-a8c93a647108 | ||
| + | }} | ||
{{Tags | {{Tags | ||
|Has Location=USA; United States | |Has Location=USA; United States | ||
Revision as of 18:47, 26 May 2020
ResourcesCases
The Ethics of Public Health Research on Less Expensive, Less Effective Interventions
What is this about?
The Kennedy Krieger lead paint study stirred controversial questions about whether research designed to develop less expensive interventions that are not as effective as existing treatments can be ethically warranted[1]. This is a factual case.
- ↑ Buchanan, David R., and Franklin G. Miller. "Justice and fairness in the Kennedy Krieger Institute lead paint study: the ethics of public health research on less expensive, less effective interventions." American journal of public health 96.5 (2006): 781-787.
Why is this important?
Critics questioned the social value of such research and alleged that it sanctions a double standard, exploits participants, and is complicit in perpetuating the social injustice[1].
- ↑ Buchanan, David R., and Franklin G. Miller. "Justice and fairness in the Kennedy Krieger Institute lead paint study: the ethics of public health research on less expensive, less effective interventions." American journal of public health 96.5 (2006): 781-787.
