Difference between revisions of "Resource:Ae70d213-bfc4-4def-b32b-ec04d8784f96"

From The Embassy of Good Science
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|Resource Type=Cases
 
|Resource Type=Cases
 
|Title=Rampant Plagiarism in Two Journals
 
|Title=Rampant Plagiarism in Two Journals
|Is About=This case is about two journals, Science Reuters and Insight Knowledge, who were involved in plagiarizing scientific articles.  
+
|Is About=This case is about two journals who were involved in plagiarizing scientific articles. This is a factual case.
 
 
 
 
This is a factual case.
 
 
|Important Because=Scientific fraud is not only committed by researchers, but also publishers can be involved in plagiarism.
 
|Important Because=Scientific fraud is not only committed by researchers, but also publishers can be involved in plagiarism.
 
 
Website Blog (Scientist)
 
 
|Important For=Researchers; Journal publishers; Publishers
 
|Important For=Researchers; Journal publishers; Publishers
 
}}
 
}}
Line 15: Line 9:
 
|Has Link=https://www.the-scientist.com/daily-news/rampant-plagiarism-in-two-journals-39289
 
|Has Link=https://www.the-scientist.com/daily-news/rampant-plagiarism-in-two-journals-39289
 
}}
 
}}
{{Related To}}
+
{{Related To
 +
|Related To Theme=Theme:02592695-e4f8-473c-a944-adfe0d8094c0
 +
}}
 
{{Tags
 
{{Tags
 
|Involves=Science Reuters; Insight Knowledge
 
|Involves=Science Reuters; Insight Knowledge

Revision as of 19:36, 26 May 2020

Cases

Rampant Plagiarism in Two Journals

What is this about?

This case is about two journals who were involved in plagiarizing scientific articles. This is a factual case.

Why is this important?

Scientific fraud is not only committed by researchers, but also publishers can be involved in plagiarism.

For whom is this important?

Other information

When
Virtues & Values
Good Practices & Misconduct
Research Area
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6