Revision as of 20:00, 26 May 2020

Resources

Cases

Scientist Ousted From Cancer Study Declines to Testify to House Panel

What is this about?

Data falsification in a series of studies which showed that lumpectomy was as effective as removing the entire breast for preventing recurrence in many women with early cancer. This is a factual case.

Why is this important?

To give insight in different ways of cheating in clinical trials.

For whom is this important?

researchersresearch leadersAll stakeholders in researchphd students

Other information

Who

When

1985-1990

Where

Canada

Virtues & Values

Good Practices & Misconduct

Research Area

Clinical medicine

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{Resource
 |Resource Type=Cases
-|Title=Scientist ousted from cancer study declines to testify to House panel
+|Title=Scientist Ousted From Cancer Study Declines to Testify to House Panel
-|Is About=Data falsification in a series of studies which showed that lumpectomy was as effective as removing the entire breast for preventing recurrence in many women with early cancer.
+|Is About=Data falsification in a series of studies which showed that lumpectomy was as effective as removing the entire breast for preventing recurrence in many women with early cancer. This is a factual case.
-This is a factual case.
 |Important Because=To give insight in different ways of cheating in clinical trials.
-Journal
-<br />
 |Important For=researchers; research leaders; All stakeholders in research; phd students
 }}
@@ Line 17: / Line 9: @@
 |Has Link=https://www.nytimes.com/1994/04/12/science/doctor-s-world-scientist-ousted-cancer-study-declines-testify-house-panel.html
 }}
-{{Related To}}
+{{Related To
+|Related To Theme=Theme:047c3bec-1747-499b-b6d5-684cbfb81edd;Theme:5f65272f-6e95-4768-8236-bc821a97f3d8
+}}
 {{Tags
 |Involves=Roger Poisson; Bernard Fisher

Difference between revisions of "Resource:4be659bc-2261-4e62-b4ed-d746e9f2c5be"