Difference between revisions of "Resource:606c4f6b-253b-475e-8ee3-d2762e65bdbe"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Resource | {{Resource | ||
|Resource Type=Cases | |Resource Type=Cases | ||
| − | |Title=The | + | |Title=The Epistemic Integrity of Scientific Research |
| − | |Is About=This case describes a concept of epistemic integrity that is based on the property of deceptiveness, and argues that this concept does meet Carnap’s four requirements of explication. To illustrate and support their claims they use several examples from scientific practice, mainly from biomedical research<ref> | + | |Is About=This case describes a concept of epistemic integrity that is based on the property of deceptiveness, and argues that this concept does meet Carnap’s four requirements of explication. To illustrate and support their claims they use several examples from scientific practice, mainly from biomedical research<ref>De Winter, Jan, and Laszlo Kosolosky. "The epistemic integrity of scientific research." ''Science and Engineering Ethics'' 19.3 (2013): 757-774.</ref>. This is a factual case. |
| − | + | <references /> | |
| − | + | |Important Because=We live in a world in which scientific expertise and its epistemic authority become more important. On the other hand, the financial interests in research, which could potentially corrupt science, are increasing. Due to these two tendencies, a concern for the integrity of scientific research becomes increasingly vital<ref>De Winter, Jan, and Laszlo Kosolosky. "The epistemic integrity of scientific research." ''Science and Engineering Ethics'' 19.3 (2013): 757-774.</ref>. | |
| − | This is a factual case. | + | <references /> |
| − | |Important Because=We live in a world in which scientific expertise and its epistemic authority become more important. On the other hand, the financial interests in research, which could potentially corrupt science, are increasing. Due to these two tendencies, a concern for the integrity of scientific research becomes increasingly vital<ref> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|Important For=Researchers | |Important For=Researchers | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 15: | Line 11: | ||
|Has Link=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11948-012-9394-3 | |Has Link=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11948-012-9394-3 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | {{Related To}} | + | {{Related To |
| + | |Related To Theme=Theme:E30b6f25-2071-4f6c-80ed-7c22f9d0e4ab | ||
| + | }} | ||
{{Tags | {{Tags | ||
|Involves=Merck & Co | |Involves=Merck & Co | ||
Revision as of 20:51, 26 May 2020
ResourcesCases
The Epistemic Integrity of Scientific Research
What is this about?
This case describes a concept of epistemic integrity that is based on the property of deceptiveness, and argues that this concept does meet Carnap’s four requirements of explication. To illustrate and support their claims they use several examples from scientific practice, mainly from biomedical research[1]. This is a factual case.
- ↑ De Winter, Jan, and Laszlo Kosolosky. "The epistemic integrity of scientific research." Science and Engineering Ethics 19.3 (2013): 757-774.
Why is this important?
We live in a world in which scientific expertise and its epistemic authority become more important. On the other hand, the financial interests in research, which could potentially corrupt science, are increasing. Due to these two tendencies, a concern for the integrity of scientific research becomes increasingly vital[1].
- ↑ De Winter, Jan, and Laszlo Kosolosky. "The epistemic integrity of scientific research." Science and Engineering Ethics 19.3 (2013): 757-774.
