Difference between revisions of "Resource:7bfab1c1-adcd-4e8b-b8e4-44f1f7b992c5"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|Is About=Denmark has had its share of serious scientific fraud that occured many years ago. It was, therefore, some widely published cases from the United States around 10 that motivated the Danish Medical Research Council to establish the Danish Committee on Scientific Dishonesty in November 12, a national committee covering health sciences<ref>Andersen, Daniel. "From case management to prevention of scientific dishonesty in Denmark." ''Science and engineering ethics'' 6.1 (2000): 25-34.</ref>. This is a factual anonymized case. | |Is About=Denmark has had its share of serious scientific fraud that occured many years ago. It was, therefore, some widely published cases from the United States around 10 that motivated the Danish Medical Research Council to establish the Danish Committee on Scientific Dishonesty in November 12, a national committee covering health sciences<ref>Andersen, Daniel. "From case management to prevention of scientific dishonesty in Denmark." ''Science and engineering ethics'' 6.1 (2000): 25-34.</ref>. This is a factual anonymized case. | ||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
| − | |Important Because=It was considered important that a broad spectrum of the health sciences | + | |Important Because=It was considered important that a broad spectrum of the health sciences is represented on the committee. The main reason for this was that decisions on honesty/dishonesty, being by their nature inexact and judgemental, must reflect the general culture in the research environment<ref>Andersen, Daniel. "From case management to prevention of scientific dishonesty in Denmark." ''Science and engineering ethics'' 6.1 (2000): 25-34.</ref> |
<references /> | <references /> | ||
|Important For=researchers; research leaders | |Important For=researchers; research leaders | ||
Revision as of 11:07, 4 August 2020
ResourcesCases
From Case Management to Prevention of Scientific Dishonesty in Denmark
What is this about?
Denmark has had its share of serious scientific fraud that occured many years ago. It was, therefore, some widely published cases from the United States around 10 that motivated the Danish Medical Research Council to establish the Danish Committee on Scientific Dishonesty in November 12, a national committee covering health sciences[1]. This is a factual anonymized case.
- ↑ Andersen, Daniel. "From case management to prevention of scientific dishonesty in Denmark." Science and engineering ethics 6.1 (2000): 25-34.
Why is this important?
It was considered important that a broad spectrum of the health sciences is represented on the committee. The main reason for this was that decisions on honesty/dishonesty, being by their nature inexact and judgemental, must reflect the general culture in the research environment[1]
- ↑ Andersen, Daniel. "From case management to prevention of scientific dishonesty in Denmark." Science and engineering ethics 6.1 (2000): 25-34.
