Difference between revisions of "Resource:Ca0b7f16-c130-40d9-bae4-c92c7a0d025a"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Resource Type=Cases | |Resource Type=Cases | ||
|Title=Plagiarism in a PhD Thesis | |Title=Plagiarism in a PhD Thesis | ||
| − | |Is About=This is a | + | |Is About=This is an anonymised report that entails the decision, summary of findings and proceedings about a case of plagiarism. Various parts of two journal articles such as text, equations, figures and tables are copied into a PhD thesis, representing a clear-cut case of plagiarism. |
| + | |Important Because=It shows that plagiarism comes in different forms and does not just pertain to copy-pasting text. Furthermore, it provides a detailed example of how cases of misconduct are investigated. | ||
|Important For=Researchers | |Important For=Researchers | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 18:21, 8 August 2020
ResourcesCases
Plagiarism in a PhD Thesis
What is this about?
This is an anonymised report that entails the decision, summary of findings and proceedings about a case of plagiarism. Various parts of two journal articles such as text, equations, figures and tables are copied into a PhD thesis, representing a clear-cut case of plagiarism.
Why is this important?
It shows that plagiarism comes in different forms and does not just pertain to copy-pasting text. Furthermore, it provides a detailed example of how cases of misconduct are investigated.
