Difference between revisions of "Resource:Ae70d213-bfc4-4def-b32b-ec04d8784f96"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
{{Tags | {{Tags | ||
|Involves=Science Reuters; Insight Knowledge | |Involves=Science Reuters; Insight Knowledge | ||
− | |Has Timepoint=22-5-2013 | + | |Has Timepoint=22-5-2013; 2013 |
|Has Location=USA; United States | |Has Location=USA; United States | ||
|Has Virtue And Value=Honesty | |Has Virtue And Value=Honesty |
Revision as of 10:38, 17 September 2020
Resources
Cases
Rampant Plagiarism in Two Journals
What is this about?
This case is about two journals who were involved in plagiarizing scientific articles. This is a factual case.
Why is this important?
Scientific fraud is not only committed by researchers, but also publishers can be involved in plagiarism.