Difference between revisions of "Resource:A7919d90-d89f-4158-a768-eb8b7b315312"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Resource Type=Cases | |Resource Type=Cases | ||
|Title=Long Distance Collaboration | |Title=Long Distance Collaboration | ||
| − | |Is About=This is a fictional case. | + | |Is About=This case deals with an interdisciplinary and cross-country collaboration (between a theorist and an experimentalist). The case is detailed an involves a number of questions related to responsibilities in scientific collaborations, authorship, and publication review. This is a fictional case. |
| − | |Important For=Researchers | + | |Important Because=Cross-boundary collaboration (between disciplines, countries, institutions) is becoming more common to address scientific problems and societal challenges that are difficult to answer from one discipline or setting. It is important to understand the types of problems that can arise during such collaborations. |
| + | |Important For=Researchers; Early career researchers; PI; Principal investigators; ECR; Journal editors | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Link | {{Link | ||
Latest revision as of 14:09, 17 September 2020
ResourcesCases
Long Distance Collaboration
What is this about?
This case deals with an interdisciplinary and cross-country collaboration (between a theorist and an experimentalist). The case is detailed an involves a number of questions related to responsibilities in scientific collaborations, authorship, and publication review. This is a fictional case.
Why is this important?
Cross-boundary collaboration (between disciplines, countries, institutions) is becoming more common to address scientific problems and societal challenges that are difficult to answer from one discipline or setting. It is important to understand the types of problems that can arise during such collaborations.
