Revision as of 12:46, 19 October 2020

Resources

Cases

The Aftermath of Scientific Fraud

What is this about?

This is a factual case.

Why is this important?

For whom is this important?

ResearchersAll stakeholders in researchEditorsStudentsJournals

Other information

When

Where

Virtues & Values

Good Practices & Misconduct

Research Area

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 |Resource Type=Cases
 |Title=The Aftermath of Scientific Fraud
-|Is About=Scientific fraud became front-page news at the end of last year, when a South Korean stem cell researcher admitted to fabricating data about cloned human embryonic stem cell lines that he claimed were created from patients. Much of the press coverage focused on the fallout of his actions on the public's trust in science and the already fragile image of stem cell research<ref>Bonetta, Laura. "The aftermath of scientific fraud." ''Cell'' 124.5 (2006): 873-875.</ref>. This is a factual case.
+|Is About=This is a factual case.
+<references />
+|Important Because=<br />
 <references />
-|Important Because=The aftermath of scientific fraud can result in harmful consequences for responsible authors, journal audience <ref>Xie, Yun (2008-08-12). "What are the consequences of scientific misconduct?". Science. Ars Technica. 321 (5890): 775. doi:10.1126/science.</ref>, whistleblowers who expose it <ref>Faunce T, Jefferys S. Whistleblowing and Scientific Misconduct: Renewing Legal and Virtue Ethics Foundations. Medicine and law. 2007;26:567-84.</ref>, but also for science itself since these misconducts reduce public’s trust in science <ref>Mojon-Azzi SM, Mojon DS. Scientific misconduct: from salami slicing to data fabrication. Ophthalmologica Journal international d'ophtalmologie International journal of ophthalmology Zeitschrift fur Augenheilkunde. 2004;218(1):1-3.</ref>. In addition, scientific fraud in medical research can have serious public health consequences since it has a direct impact on the physical and psychological well-being of the individual.
 |Important For=Researchers; All stakeholders in research; Editors; Students; Journals
 }}
@@ Line 14: / Line 15: @@
 }}
 {{Tags
-|Involves=Eric Poehlman; Gerald P. Schatten
 |Has Timepoint=2000; 2005
 |Has Location=USA; United States

Difference between revisions of "Resource:15de5331-8dc3-4dba-8b81-5abcb412e698"

Revision as of 12:46, 19 October 2020

The Aftermath of Scientific Fraud

What is this about?

Why is this important?

For whom is this important?

Other information

When

Where

Virtues & Values

Good Practices & Misconduct

Research Area