Difference between revisions of "Resource:2958e5c9-7d9e-44c9-aca0-7e3c0ad7afe8"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Tags | {{Tags | ||
| − | |Involves= | + | |Involves=Retraction Watch |
|Has Timepoint=24-10-2017 | |Has Timepoint=24-10-2017 | ||
|Has Location=USA; United States | |Has Location=USA; United States | ||
Latest revision as of 18:03, 25 October 2020
ResourcesCases
Researcher 'Cherry Picked' Data, University Investigation Finds
What is this about?
This case is about a professor of biomedical engineering whose paper got retracted because only certain data points were reported that supported the paper's conclusion.
Why is this important?
Scientific fraud is not only about presenting false data, but also about not 'cherry picking' i.e. selecting certain data points to confirm or suport a specific hypothesis or make a result appear more spectacular.
