Difference between revisions of "Resource:18a89181-ee50-4dee-82c3-f44c4a7454dc"
From The Embassy of Good Science
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Resource Type=Cases | |Resource Type=Cases | ||
|Title=Researcher Accused of Breaching Research Ethics Faces GMC | |Title=Researcher Accused of Breaching Research Ethics Faces GMC | ||
| − | |Is About=This factual case describes an instance in which a researcher is accused of scientific misconduct by the General Medical Council (GMC). The researcher allegedly lied to trial sponsors and other research institutions about | + | |Is About=This factual case describes an instance in which a researcher is accused of scientific misconduct by the General Medical Council (GMC). The researcher allegedly lied to trial sponsors and other research institutions about having obtained ethical approval and about the existence of other sponsors. In addition, the accused researcher used the titles of professor and Ph.D. without obtaining a doctorate. |
| − | |Important Because=Ethical approval for scientific research is extremely important. Otherwise, the health of | + | |Important Because=Ethical approval for scientific research is extremely important. Otherwise, the health of research participants may be harmed. Similarly, performing biomedical research without being properly trained to do so may have serious consequences for both the health of research participants as well as the quality of the research. Therefore, lying about such approval and one’s credentials are serious offences and should be punished severely. |
|Important For=Researchers; research leaders; phd students | |Important For=Researchers; research leaders; phd students | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 16:33, 19 August 2021
ResourcesCases
Researcher Accused of Breaching Research Ethics Faces GMC
What is this about?
This factual case describes an instance in which a researcher is accused of scientific misconduct by the General Medical Council (GMC). The researcher allegedly lied to trial sponsors and other research institutions about having obtained ethical approval and about the existence of other sponsors. In addition, the accused researcher used the titles of professor and Ph.D. without obtaining a doctorate.
Why is this important?
Ethical approval for scientific research is extremely important. Otherwise, the health of research participants may be harmed. Similarly, performing biomedical research without being properly trained to do so may have serious consequences for both the health of research participants as well as the quality of the research. Therefore, lying about such approval and one’s credentials are serious offences and should be punished severely.
