False results, premature infants and the CNEP trial

From The Embassy of Good Science
Revision as of 11:55, 10 August 2020 by 0000-0001-8342-1051 (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Cases

False results, premature infants and the CNEP trial

What is this about?

A study compared two ways of nursing premature infants who require respiratory support. False results were generated by the study. This is a factual case.

Why is this important?

In this specific context, false results mislead not only health care staff and medical researchers, but also the parents of premature babies.

For whom is this important?

Other information

Virtues & Values
Good Practices & Misconduct
Research Area
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6