The AAP report on circumcision: Bad science + bad ethics = bad medicine

From The Embassy of Good Science
Revision as of 12:21, 21 June 2021 by 0000-0002-1723-7560 (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Cases |Title=The AAP report on circumcision: Bad science + bad ethics = bad medicine |Is About=This blog describes some of the arguments against the...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Cases

The AAP report on circumcision: Bad science + bad ethics = bad medicine

What is this about?

This blog describes some of the arguments against the case of the AAP's (American Academy of Peadiatrics) change of policy's position in relation to infant male circumcision. The author of the blog suggests that whilst the evidence remains the same, institutions can 'cherry pick' findings to support their own conclusions.

For whom is this important?

Other information

Who
When
Where
Virtues & Values
Good Practices & Misconduct
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6