Search results
From The Embassy of Good Science
- Add or select one or more good practices or misconducts ⧼SA Foundation Data Type⧽: Text379 bytes (15 words) - 16:09, 28 November 2023
- trainers The train-the-trainer program has an aspirational approach, and focuses on what it means to be a good and virtuous researcher. Instead of teaching5 KB (607 words) - 14:36, 16 April 2024
- be able to retrieve and delete data after the data has been stored. The Embassy of Good Science has been developed by the EnTIRE and VIRT2UE projects.2 KB (369 words) - 09:38, 28 June 2021
- The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity - 2017 Edition (section Good Practices & Misconduct)provides a set of fundamental principles for research integrity, a set of good research practices, and highlights the potential violations of research integrity2 KB (228 words) - 11:28, 10 April 2024
- Main Page (section About The Embassy of Good Science)community Training Develop knowledge through training About The Embassy of Good Science A place where the community can share experiences and insights, deepening1 KB (122 words) - 11:55, 29 November 2022
- The Embassy Symposium The Embassy Foundation General Meeting The Embassy has a strong presence in the upcoming WCRI 2022 in Capetown. Join us for these2 KB (220 words) - 12:06, 24 May 2022
- Guidelines for Good Scientific Practice, research misconduct refers to wilful, conscious or grossly negligent violation of the Standards of Good Scientific8 KB (1,119 words) - 14:14, 11 December 2019
- external communication. This includes assistance of The Embassy team, which has associated costs. If you are interested in being a partner as described above2 KB (271 words) - 15:51, 30 November 2021
- trainers The train-the-trainer program has an aspirational approach, and focuses on what it means to be a good and virtuous researcher. Instead of teaching6 KB (751 words) - 15:02, 21 October 2020
- peer-reviewed manuscripts. In fact, the number of publications a researcher has is commonly used as a parameter for career progression or funding acquisition8 KB (1,039 words) - 17:49, 25 March 2021
- This is usually done by guidelines, checklists and other documents in which good research practices are presented. Moreover, RI committees are responsible4 KB (546 words) - 14:10, 22 October 2021
- About (section The Embassy of Good Science)policies and guidelines informing good practices and highlight relevant cases, experiences, educational materials and good practice examples. We will also8 KB (750 words) - 11:38, 10 April 2024
- Embassy of Good Science” is offered over the internet in the form of Software-as-a-Service by the Embassy Foundation. The use of The Embassy of Good Science12 KB (1,803 words) - 16:23, 23 March 2022
- integrity The train-the-trainer program has an aspirational approach, and focuses on what it means to be a good and virtuous researcher. Instead of teaching7 KB (775 words) - 16:11, 28 November 2023
- provides a set of fundamental principles for research integrity, a set of good research practices, and highlights the potential violations of research integrity2 KB (186 words) - 11:33, 29 June 2021
- Rights “everybody has the right to respect for his private and family life and his correspondence”. Within research settings privacy has become increasingly3 KB (426 words) - 10:44, 16 October 2020
- Dubious Peer Reviews Lead to 10 Retractions (section Geology Paper Has a Rocky Road is Now Retracted)open resource EditView sourceHistory Find out Resources Cases In 2018 SAGE retracted 10 papers which had been published in Advances in Mechanical Engineering2 KB (239 words) - 20:24, 27 October 2020
- certain time period. Important for succesfull research collaborations is having good underlying principles providing the basis for agreements of collaborations4 KB (519 words) - 15:48, 12 October 2020
- numerous guidelines . For example, Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) has issued several guidelines for dealing with conflict of interest, from both6 KB (656 words) - 16:07, 20 October 2020
- authorship confers credit, carries responsibility, and readers should know who has done the research. Denying authorship to somebody who deserves it denies recognition4 KB (465 words) - 15:47, 25 March 2021