Long pages
From The Embassy of Good Science
50 s ordered by recently added
- (hist) The AVATAR method: historical empathy through imagination [928 bytes]
- (hist) Premature release of clinical trials data [928 bytes]
- (hist) Design and Development of a Course in Professionalism and Ethics for CDIO Curriculum in China [928 bytes]
- (hist) European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) Code of Ethics [928 bytes]
- (hist) Make research misconduct involving agri inputs a criminal fraud: CCFI [927 bytes]
- (hist) Final Findings of Scientific Misconduct [927 bytes]
- (hist) Joint position paper of the General Faculty (AFT) and the German University Association (DHV) [926 bytes]
- (hist) The AAP report on circumcision: Bad science + bad ethics = bad medicine [925 bytes]
- (hist) Five-step authorship framework to improve transparency in disclosing contributors to industry-sponsored clinical trial publications [924 bytes]
- (hist) False, Fabricated or Misleading Data [923 bytes]
- (hist) European Association of Archaeologists (EAA) Code of Practice for Fieldwork Training [922 bytes]
- (hist) Responsible science: vol. 1 [921 bytes]
- (hist) Rights to Authorship [921 bytes]
- (hist) EnRRIch project- tool for educators [921 bytes]
- (hist) European Commission Guidance on Research on Refugees, Asylum Seekers & Migrants [921 bytes]
- (hist) Application of a sensemaking approach to ethics training in the physical sciences and engineering [920 bytes]
- (hist) Mentoring: minorities [917 bytes]
- (hist) What should a journal do when a scientist who committed misconduct submits a new paper? [916 bytes]
- (hist) European College of Neuropsychopharmacology (ECNP) Code of Conduct [915 bytes]
- (hist) Discovery of Error in One's Own Work [914 bytes]
- (hist) Innovation under pressure: Implications for data privacy during the Covid-19 pandemic [912 bytes]
- (hist) Federation of European Pharmacological Societies (EPHAR) Ethical Code of Conduct [912 bytes]
- (hist) Preparing raw clinical data for publication: guidance for journal editors, authors, and peer reviewers [911 bytes]
- (hist) Scientists in Chile Protest Mummy Study [911 bytes]
- (hist) International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Conflict of Interest Disclosure Form [911 bytes]
- (hist) Reviewing the Ethics of Extended Reality [910 bytes]
- (hist) Data Sharing and Potential Future Uses [910 bytes]
- (hist) The Professionalism and Integrity in Research Program: Description and Preliminary Outcomes [910 bytes]
- (hist) Procrastinating Researcher Delegates Grant Reviews to Trainee [908 bytes]
- (hist) Duplicate publication uprooted from plant journal [908 bytes]
- (hist) Who Owns the Field Notes [908 bytes]
- (hist) Croatia's science minister rejects calls to resign amid plagiarism scandal [906 bytes]
- (hist) Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation – Open Access Policy (2025 update) [901 bytes]
- (hist) Practical Guide to the International Alignment of Research Data Management [900 bytes]
- (hist) Five cases considered and concluded by the UK's General Medical Council [899 bytes]
- (hist) Responsible science: vol. 2 [899 bytes]
- (hist) ROSiE Video Lectures [898 bytes]
- (hist) Reporting Full Findings [898 bytes]
- (hist) The Hazardous Consent Forms [897 bytes]
- (hist) Italian National Research Center Guidelines for Integrity in Research [896 bytes]
- (hist) Hungarian Decree on the system of integrity management at public administration bodies and the procedural rules of receiving lobbyists [895 bytes]
- (hist) Site Unseen [895 bytes]
- (hist) Community consultation and public disclosure: preliminary results from a new model [895 bytes]
- (hist) Business Ethics Perspectives: Faculty Plagiarism and Fraud [893 bytes]
- (hist) NTU (Nanyang Technological University) Research Integrity Policy [891 bytes]
- (hist) Hazardous materials [891 bytes]
- (hist) Inexperienced researcher gives too much caffeine to subjects [889 bytes]
- (hist) A bibliometric analysis of an international research ethics trainee program [888 bytes]
- (hist) Reviewing the Ethics of Biobanking [887 bytes]
- (hist) Retraction notice - fake email peer-review [887 bytes]
